RANDHAWA (Migration)
[2018] AATA 655
•13 March 2018
RANDHAWA (Migration) [2018] AATA 655 (13 March 2018)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Mr VIKRAM JIT RANDHAWA
CASE NUMBER: 1608213
DIBP REFERENCE(S): BCC2015/1605724
MEMBER:Denis Dragovic
DATE:13 March 2018
PLACE OF DECISION: Melbourne
DECISION:The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.
Statement made on 13 March 2018 at 2:14pm
CATCHWORDS
Migration – Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa – Subclass 820 – Did not appear before the Tribunal – Reinstatement of the application not sought
LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, ss 362B, 362C
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 19 May 2016 to refuse to grant the visa applicant a Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) Subclass 820 visa under the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).
On 21 February 2018 the Tribunal dismissed the application under s.362B(1A)(b) of the Act as the review applicant did not appear before it to give evidence and present arguments at the time and date of the scheduled hearing.
The review applicant was notified of the dismissal decision and given a copy of a written statement setting out the decision and the reasons for the decision, in accordance with s.362C(5). The review applicant was advised that reinstatement of the application could be sought within 14 days of receiving the dismissal statement and that a failure to apply for reinstatement within the 14 day period would result in confirmation of the dismissal decision.
As the review applicant did not apply for reinstatement of the application within the 14 days period, the Tribunal must confirm the decision to dismiss the application. In these circumstances, the decision under review is taken to be affirmed.
DECISION
The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.
Denis Dragovic
Senior Member
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Judicial Review
-
Jurisdiction
-
Remedies
0
0
0