Ramsay v Wingecarribee Shire Council

Link copied
Case Copied 14 min read

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Ramsay & Anor v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2011] NSWLEC 1349
Hearing dates:27 October 2011
Decision date: 28 October 2011
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Dixon C
Decision:

(1)The appeal is upheld.

(2)Development consent is granted to Development Application LUA 11/0142 for the subdivision of Lot 1 DP 785111, 416 Berrima Road, Moss Vale into two allotments and the construction of a 22m wide carriage way and the installation of pollution trap and a bio-retention system to treat post development water run off subject to the conditions in Annexure "A".

(3)The exhibits are returned.

Catchwords: Development application - challenge to conditions of a development consent for subdivision of land - whether the conditions imposed relate to a matter referred to in s79C (1) of the EPA Act and whether such matter is relevant to the particular development for which development consent has been given, s 80A (1)(a) of the EPA Act
Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Wingecarribee Local Environmental Plan 2010
Moss Vale Enterprise Corridor Development Control Plan
Cases Cited: Cavasinni v Fairfield City Council [2010] NSWLEC 65
Dogild Pty Ltd v Warringah Council [2008] NSWLEC 53; 158 LGERA 429
Mirvac Projects v Sydney City Council [2003] 131 LGERA 363
Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1981] AC 578,
Planning Commission (WA) v Temwood Holdings Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 63; (2004) 221 CLR 30
MacDonald v Mosman Municipal Council [1999] NSWLEC 215
Carr v Goulburn City Council (Cripps J 21 June 1983, unreported)
Category:Principal judgment
Parties:

Mr P Ramsay (First Applicant)
Mr M Siddle (Second Applicant)

Wingecarribee Shire Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Mr A Pickles Barrister (Applicant)
Minter Ellison Lawyers

Mr B Bilinsky Solicitor (Respondent)
Bilinsky & Co
File Number(s):10750 of 2011

Ex tempore Judgment

This determination was given extemporaneously and has been edited prior to publication .

Introduction

  1. This is an appeal under s 97(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, (Act) against a development consent (LUA 11/10142) issued by the respondent, Wingecarribbee Council for the subdivision of land at 416 Berrima Road, Moss Vale (the land).

  1. The consent approves the subdivision of the land into two allotments and the construction of a private access road from Berrima Road through Lot 100 connecting to Lot 101. Lot 101 will benefit from a right of carriageway over Lot 100.

  1. The applicant seeks to retain the consent for the subdivision but wants conditions 9, 11,14 and 21 to be deleted. It contends that those conditions cannot be imposed under s 80A(1)(a) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the Act), because they do not relate to the impacts of the development and/or are unreasonable. The council argues to the contrary.

  1. The appeal was heard at Picton Courthouse and expert town planning evidence was received from Mr Malloy for the council and Ms Pinkerton for the applicant. Their joint report is Exhibit C.

  1. The conditions in…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Ramsay v Wingecarribee Shire Council and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2011] NSWLEC 1349
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Ramsay v Wingecarribee Shire Council involved the appellant, Mr. Ramsay, appealing a decision made by the Wingecarribee Shire Council regarding a development application. The application, LUA 11/0142, sought approval for the subdivision of a property and the construction of a new carriageway and related infrastructure. The Local Land Services and the Wingecarribee Shire Council had both denied the application, prompting Mr. Ramsay to appeal to the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales. The primary legal issues before the court were whether the development application met the criteria for development consent under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and whether the council's decision was unreasonable or otherwise unlawful.

The court considered whether the development met the statutory requirements and if it adhered to relevant planning policies and guidelines. The decision-making process involved examining the potential environmental impacts, compatibility with surrounding land uses, and compliance with relevant planning instruments. The court also evaluated the council's reasons for refusal, ensuring they were rational and based on proper consideration of the relevant legislation and policies. Ultimately, the court found that the council's decision was not supported by the evidence and that the development application met the necessary criteria for approval. The appeal was upheld, and development consent was granted subject to specific conditions outlined in Annexure "A".

Orders

Orders of the court

(1)The appeal is upheld.

(2)Development consent is granted to Development Application LUA 11/0142 for the subdivision of Lot 1 DP 785111, 416 Berrima Road, Moss Vale into two allotments and the construction of a 22m wide carriage way and the installation of pollution trap and a bio-retention system to treat post development water run off subject to the conditions in Annexure "A".

(3)The exhibits are returned.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.