Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ramsay & Anor v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2011] NSWLEC 1349 Hearing dates: 27 October 2011 Decision date: 28 October 2011 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon C Decision: (1)The appeal is upheld.
(2)Development consent is granted to Development Application LUA 11/0142 for the subdivision of Lot 1 DP 785111, 416 Berrima Road, Moss Vale into two allotments and the construction of a 22m wide carriage way and the installation of pollution trap and a bio-retention system to treat post development water run off subject to the conditions in Annexure "A".
(3)The exhibits are returned.
Catchwords: Development application - challenge to conditions of a development consent for subdivision of land - whether the conditions imposed relate to a matter referred to in s79C (1) of the EPA Act and whether such matter is relevant to the particular development for which development consent has been given, s 80A (1)(a) of the EPA Act Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Wingecarribee Local Environmental Plan 2010
Moss Vale Enterprise Corridor Development Control PlanCases Cited: Cavasinni v Fairfield City Council [2010] NSWLEC 65
Dogild Pty Ltd v Warringah Council [2008] NSWLEC 53; 158 LGERA 429
Mirvac Projects v Sydney City Council [2003] 131 LGERA 363
Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1981] AC 578,
Planning Commission (WA) v Temwood Holdings Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 63; (2004) 221 CLR 30
MacDonald v Mosman Municipal Council [1999] NSWLEC 215
Carr v Goulburn City Council (Cripps J 21 June 1983, unreported)Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr P Ramsay (First Applicant)
Wingecarribee Shire Council (Respondent)
Mr M Siddle (Second Applicant)Representation: Mr A Pickles Barrister (Applicant)
Mr B Bilinsky Solicitor (Respondent)
Minter Ellison Lawyers
Bilinsky & Co
File Number(s): 10750 of 2011
Ex tempore Judgment
This determination was given extemporaneously and has been edited prior to publication .
Introduction
This is an appeal under s 97(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, (Act) against a development consent (LUA 11/10142) issued by the respondent, Wingecarribbee Council for the subdivision of land at 416 Berrima Road, Moss Vale (the land).
The consent approves the subdivision of the land into two allotments and the construction of a private access road from Berrima Road through Lot 100 connecting to Lot 101. Lot 101 will benefit from a right of carriageway over Lot 100.
The applicant seeks to retain the consent for the subdivision but wants conditions 9, 11,14 and 21 to be deleted. It contends that those conditions cannot be imposed under s 80A(1)(a) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the Act), because they do not relate to the impacts of the development and/or are unreasonable. The council argues to the contrary.
The appeal was heard at Picton Courthouse and expert town planning evidence was received from Mr Malloy for the council and Ms Pinkerton for the applicant. Their joint report is Exhibit C.
The conditions in…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Ramsay v Wingecarribee Shire Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2011] NSWLEC 1349
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered whether the development met the statutory requirements and if it adhered to relevant planning policies and guidelines. The decision-making process involved examining the potential environmental impacts, compatibility with surrounding land uses, and compliance with relevant planning instruments. The court also evaluated the council's reasons for refusal, ensuring they were rational and based on proper consideration of the relevant legislation and policies. Ultimately, the court found that the council's decision was not supported by the evidence and that the development application met the necessary criteria for approval. The appeal was upheld, and development consent was granted subject to specific conditions outlined in Annexure "A".
Orders
Orders of the court
(1)The appeal is upheld.
(2)Development consent is granted to Development Application LUA 11/0142 for the subdivision of Lot 1 DP 785111, 416 Berrima Road, Moss Vale into two allotments and the construction of a 22m wide carriage way and the installation of pollution trap and a bio-retention system to treat post development water run off subject to the conditions in Annexure "A".
(3)The exhibits are returned.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.