Rahalh Sloman v Extreme Formwork
[2020] FWC 4988
•17 SEPTEMBER 2020
| [2020] FWC 4988 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal
Rahalh Sloman
v
Extreme Formwork
(U2020/10053)
COMMISSIONER BISSETT | MELBOURNE, 17 SEPTEMBER 2020 |
Application for an unfair dismissal remedy – incomplete telephone application – dismissal under s587 at the Commission’s initiative.
[1] On 23 July 2020 Mr Rahalh Sloman made an application by telephone to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).
[2] On 24 July 2020 the Commission sent correspondence to the Mr Sloman’s nominated postal address providing 14 days from the date of making the telephone application to complete a Form F2 – Unfair Dismissal Application (Application) in addition to paying the filing fee or completing a fee waiver form. A waiver form was provided with this correspondence. Mr Sloman was advised that failure to return a completed application and provide payment or a waiver form may result in his application being dismissed.
[3] On 7 August 2020 the Commission contacted Mr Sloman on his nominated telephone number as no completed application had been filed. The Commission advised Mr Sloman that a completed application and payment/waiver were still outstanding. Mr Sloman advised he had not received the letter and application form sent from the Commission on 24 July 2020. Mr Sloman advised he was still waiting for the letter to arrive at his address. The Commission informed Mr Sloman another letter, application and waiver will be sent to his nominated postal address.
[4] On 17 August 2020, the Commission attempted to contact Mr Sloman on his nominated telephone number. A voicemail message was left requesting Mr Sloman contact the Commission.
[5] On 21 August 2020, the Commission attempted to contact Mr Sloman on his nominated telephone number. The Commission was unable to leave a voicemail message. After dialling the nominated telephone number for Mr Sloman, a message was received advising the voicemail was full and to please try again later.
[6] Rule 9 of the Fair Work Commission Rules 2013 (Rules) governs applications made by telephone in the Commission. Rule 9 states as follows:
9Telephone applications
(1) This rule applies to a person wanting to:
....
(b) make an unfair dismissal application to the Commission.
(2) The person may, as an alternative to lodging the application in the approved form, make the application by telephone to a telephone number approved for that purpose by the General Manager.
Note: The telephone numbers approved by the General Manager for making a telephone application are available at The Commission must prepare a written application for the person, based on the telephone application, and give the written application to the person.
(4) The person must, within 14 calendar days after the day on which the Commission gives the written application to the person, complete and sign the written application and lodge it with the Commission and:
(a) pay:
...
(ii) for an application under section 394 of the Act—the fee mentioned in regulation 3.07 of the Regulations; or
(b) apply for a waiver of the fee.
(5) If the person applies for a waiver, and the Commission refuses that application, the person must pay the application fee within 7 calendar days of being notified of the refusal by the Commission.
(6) If:
(a) either:
(i) the person pays the application fee; or
(ii) the Commission approves a fee waiver; and
(b) the person completes and signs the written application and lodges it with the Commission;
the application is taken to have been made on the day that the person telephones the Commission to make the application in accordance with subrule (2).
(7) The process of telephoning the Commission in accordance with subrule (2), and lodging the completed and signed written application, are taken to be the application.
[7] Section 395 of the FW Act, which deals with application fees, states as follows:
395 Application fees
(1) An application to the FWC under this Division must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.
(2) The regulations may prescribe:
(a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under this Division; and
(b) a method for indexing the fee; and
(c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded.
[8] Mr Sloman has, at the time of issuing this decision, failed to file a completed application and has not paid the required fee or file a complete waiver form. The most recent attempts to contact him have been usuccessful.
[9] Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides as follows:
587 Dismissing applications
(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:
(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or
(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or
(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.
[10] Having regard to the circumstances of this matter, I am satisfied that the application was not made in accordance with the FW Act as Mr Sloman has not completed a Form F2, has not paid the required fee or filed a completed waiver form. For this reason, the application is dismissed under s.587(1)(a) of the FW Act. An Order 1 giving effect to this decision will be issued shortly.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR722850>
1 PR722851.
0
0
0