Rafique (Migration)

Case

[2017] AATA 861

1 June 2017


Rafique (Migration) [2017] AATA 861 (1 June 2017)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr Muhammad Musaddique Ali Rafique

CASE NUMBER:  1607329

DIBP REFERENCE(S):  BCC2015/3886829

MEMBER:Adrian Ho

DATE:01 June 2017

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Skilled Independent (Permanent) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criterion for a Subclass 189 visa:

·cl.189.214 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

Statement made on 01 June 2017 at 5:39pm

CATCHWORDS

Migration – Skilled Independent (Permanent) (Class SI) visa – Subclass 189 (Skilled - Independent) – Points based visa – Materials Engineer – Qualifying score achieved

LEGISLATION

Migration Act 1958, ss 65, 93, 94, 96, 350

Migration Regulations 1994, r 1.15F, r 1.15I, r 2.26AC, Schedule 2, Schedule 6D, cl 189.214

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 4 May 2016 to refuse to grant the applicant a Skilled - Independent (Permanent) (Class SI) Subclass 189 (Skilled - Independent) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). This is a points based visa designed for skilled applicants who submitted an expression of interest and received an invitation to apply for the visa.

  2. The applicant applied for the visa on 15 December 2015. The criteria for the grant of a Subclass 189 visa are set out in Part 189 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations). The delegate refused to grant the visa because the applicant did not satisfy the ‘points test’ criterion in cl.189.214.

  3. The applicant appeared before the Tribunal on 5 April 2017 to give evidence and present arguments.

  4. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

    CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

  5. The issue in the present case is whether the applicant satisfies the points test criterion which requires that the applicant’s score, when assessed in relation to the visa under Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 2 of the Act:

    ·is not less than the score stated in the invitation to apply for the visa and

    ·is not less than the ‘qualifying score’.

  6. Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 2 of the Act provides for a points system under which an applicant is given an assessed score based on a prescribed number of points for particular attributes. The qualifications and points applicable to this case are prescribed in Schedule 6D to the Regulations (r.2.26AC). An applicant achieves the qualifying score if their assessed score is more than or equal to the applicable pass mark (s.94 of the Act), which is set by the Minister from time to time under s.96(2). The Tribunal must consider the applicant against the qualifications and points prescribed in Schedule 6D, and the pass mark as in force at the time of the delegate’s assessment and as in force at the time of this assessment, and apply whichever is more favourable to the applicant (ss.93 and 350 of the Act).

  7. Some elements of the points test relate to the nominated skilled occupation. An occupation is a ‘skilled occupation’ if: it is specified by the relevant instrument as a skilled occupation; and, if a number of points are specified in the instrument as being available - for which the number of points are available; and that is applicable to the person in accordance with the specification of the occupation (r.1.15I). The relevant instrument for this purpose is Legislative Instrument IMMI 14/49. In the present case, the applicant nominated the occupation of Materials Engineer.

    Does the applicant have the qualifying score applying the law in force at the time of the delegate’s assessment?

    Part 6D.1 – Age qualifications

  8. Points are available under this Part if the applicant was aged between 18 and 44 years at the time of invitation to apply for the visa.

  9. At the time of invitation the applicant was aged between 25 and 33. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to 30 points under this part, a conclusion with which she agreed at hearing.

    Part 6D.2 – English language qualifications

  10. Points are available under this Part on the basis of the applicant’s level of English language proficiency at the time of invitation to apply for the visa.

  11. There is no evidence the applicant has superior or proficient English.  No points are awarded.

    Part 6D.3 – Overseas employment experience qualifications

  12. Points may be available under this Part if, at the time of invitation to apply for the visa, the applicant had been employed outside Australia in the applicant’s nominated skilled occupation or a closely related skilled occupation for at least 36, 60, or 96 months in the 10 years immediately before that time.

  13. The applicant gave very detailed evidence as to his work in materials engineering in Pakistan and Germany at KRL Pakistan, QADBROS ENGINEERING, DESCON engineering, Henkel AG, Germany, COMSATS Institution of Information Technology, and SAMAA Academy and submitted a large amount of documentary material supporting his work claims, much of which had not been given to the Department.

  14. The tribunal found the applicant’s description of material engineering work persuasive and is satisfied the applicant had been employed outside Australia in the nominated skilled occupation for at least 96 months in the 10 years before being invited to apply for the visa, and 15 points are awarded.

    Part 6D.4 – Australian employment qualifications

  15. Points may be available under this Part if, at the time of invitation to apply for the visa, the applicant had been employed in Australia in the nominated occupation or a closely related skilled occupation for at least 12, 36, 60 or 96 months in the 10 years immediately before that time.

  16. No points are awarded.

    Part 6D.5 - Aggregating points for employment experience qualifications

  17. Under this part, if an applicant has qualifications mentioned in both Parts 6D.3 and 6D.4 and the combined number of points that would be awarded under those Parts is more than 20 points, 20 points must be given under this Part for the qualifications and no points are to be given under Part 6D.3 or 6D.4.

  18. The applicant was informed that this part only applied if more than 20 points are awarded under Part 6D.3 and 6D.4.

    Part 6D.6 – Australian professional year qualifications

  19. Five points are available under this part if, at the time of invitation to apply for the visa, the applicant had completed a professional year (that is, a course specified in an instrument) in Australia in the nominated occupation or a closely related skilled occupation for at least 12 months in the immediately preceding 48 months.

  20. There is no evidence the applicant has completed a professional year which by IMMI 08/074, and is successor, IMMI 12/029, are programs limited to information technology, accounting and engineering graduates. 

  21. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to no points under this part.

    Part 6D.7 – Educational qualifications

  22. An applicant may be entitled to points under this Part if, at the time of invitation to apply for the visa, he or she had met the requirements for the award of a specified Australian qualification or overseas qualification of a recognised standard. In determining whether an overseas qualification is of a ‘recognised standard’ (items 6D71(b), 6D72(b)), regard must be had to the matters set out in r.2.26AC(5) which include recognition of the qualification by the relevant assessing authority, recognition of the qualification by a specified body, duration of the study and any other relevant matter.

  23. The tribunal agrees with the delegate that the applicant has at least a foreign bachelor degree that is of a recognised standard. 15 points are awarded.

    Part 6D.8 – Australian study qualifications

  24. Five points may be awarded under this part if, at the time of invitation to apply for the visa, the applicant met the Australian study requirement, as defined in r.1.15F of the Regulations. To meet the study requirement, the applicant must satisfy the Minister that they have completed 1 or more degrees, diplomas or trade qualifications for award by an Australian educational institution as a result of a registered course or courses, for which all instruction was in English. The applicant must have undertaken the courses in Australia while holding a visa authorising study, and completed them in a total of at least 16 calendar months as a result of a total of at least 2 academic years study.

  25. The Australian study requirement is not yet met and no points are awarded.

    Part 6D.9 – Credentialled community language qualifications

  26. Five points may be awarded under this part if, at the time of invitation to apply for the visa, the applicant had a qualification in a particular language awarded or accredited by a specified body, and at a specified standard for the language.

  27. The applicant conceded at hearing he had no qualification in a particular language and agreed that no points should be awarded.  No points are awarded under this part.

    Part 6D.10 – Study in regional Australia or a low-population growth metropolitan area qualifications

  28. Five points may be awarded under this part if, at the time of invitation to apply for the visa, the applicant met the Australian study requirement (as defined in r.1.15F), and that study was undertaken, and the applicant lived, in a specified area of Australia. Distance education does not qualify as study for these purposes.

  29. No claims were made under this part and no points are awarded.

    Part 6D.11 – Partner Skill Qualifications

  30. Five points may be awarded under this Part if the applicant has a spouse or de facto partner who is also an applicant for the same visa subclass and is not an Australian citizen or permanent resident. At the time the applicant was invited to apply for the visa, the spouse / partner must have been under 50 years of age, have nominated a specified skilled occupation, been assessed as having specified skills, and have competent English.

  31. No claims were made under this part and no points are awarded.

    Part 6D.12 – State or Territory nomination qualifications

  32. Points are available under this Part in certain circumstances for applicants who were invited to apply for a Subclass 190 (Skilled - Nominated) visa. The applicant in this case has not been invited to apply for such a visa and is therefore not entitled to any points under this part.

  33. No claims were made under this part and no points are awarded.

    Part 6D.13 – Designated area sponsorship qualifications

  34. Points are available under this Part in certain circumstances for applicants who were invited to apply for a Subclass 489 (Skilled - Regional) (Provisional) visa. The applicant in this case has not been invited to apply for such a visa and is therefore not entitled to any points under this part.

  35. No claims were made under this part and no points are awarded.

    Conclusion on points

  36. Based on the above assessment, having regard to the legislation in effect at the time of the delegate’s assessment, the number of points to be awarded to the applicant under Schedule 6D is:

    6D.1 - Age  30 points

    6D.2 - English language  0 points

    6D.3 - Overseas employment experience  15 points

    6D.4 - Australian employment experience  0 points

    6D.5 - Aggregated employment  0 points

    6D.6 - Australian professional year  0 points

    6D.7 - Educational  15 points

    6D.8 - Australian study  0 points

    6D.9 - Credentialled community language  0 points

    6D.10 - Study in regional / low-population area  0 points

    6D.11 - Partner skill  0 points

    6D.11 - State or Territory nomination  0 points

    6D.12 - Designated area sponsorship  0 points

    Total points  60 points

  37. The applicant’s assessed score under the points test is therefore 60 points.

  38. At the time of the delegate’s assessment the pass mark was 60 points: Legislative Instrument IMMI 12/017. The applicant has therefore achieved the qualifying score to pass the points test. 

    Has the applicant achieved the score stated in the invitation to apply for the visa?

  39. It is also a requirement that the applicant’s score is not less than the score stated in the invitation to apply for the visa. At hearing the applicant said the written invitation given to the applicant stated a score of 60 points. On the basis of the points assessment above, the Tribunal finds that the applicant has achieved the score stated in the invitation to apply for the visa.

  40. For the above reasons, the applicant is entitled to a maximum of 60 points under the points test. As the applicant’s score is not less than the score stated in the invitation to apply for the visa, and not less than the qualifying score, the applicant satisfies cl.189.214, which is a prescribed criterion for the grant of the visa. The appropriate course is to remit the application for the visa to the Minister to consider the remaining criteria.

    DECISION

  41. The Tribunal remits the application for a Skilled Independent (Permanent) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criterion for a Subclass 189 visa:

    ·cl.189.214 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

    Adrian Ho
    Member


Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Statutory Interpretation

Legal Concepts

  • Jurisdiction

  • Remedies

  • Statutory Construction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0