|
New South Wales |
Case Name: | Rafailidis v Roads and Maritime Services |
Medium Neutral Citation: | [2015] NSWCA 143 |
Hearing Date(s): | 12 May 2015 |
Decision Date: | 12 May 2015 |
Before: | Beazley P at [1]; |
Decision: | The appeal against the judgment of Craig J delivered on 11 February 2014 is dismissed. |
Catchwords: | COMPULSORY ACQUISITION – Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Act 1991 (NSW), s 66 – jurisdiction of the Land and Environment Court – no question of law |
Legislation Cited: | Constitution Act 1902 (NSW), s 5 |
Cases Cited: | Durham Holdings Pty Ltd v The State of New South Wales [2001] HCA 7; 205 CLR 399 |
Category: | Principal judgment |
Parties: | Koula Rafailidis (Applicant and Appellant) |
Representation: | Counsel: |
File Number(s): | 2014/102141 |
Decision under appeal: | |
Court or Tribunal: | Land and Environment Court |
Jurisdiction: | Class 3 |
Citation: | Rafailidis v Roads and Maritime Services (No 2) [2014] NSWLEC 9; Rafailidis v Roads and Maritime Services (No 3) [2014] NSWLEC 21 |
Date of Decision: | 11 February 2014; 18 March 2014 |
Before: | Craig J; Sheahan J |
File Number(s): | 2013/30195 |
[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]
JUDGMENT
BEAZLEY P: The appellant, Mrs Koula Rafailidis, challenges two decisions of the Land and Environment Court relating to the compulsory acquisition of land pursuant to the Roads Act 1993 (NSW) and the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (NSW).
Mr Ephram Rafailidis, the joint owner of the land with Mrs Rafailidis, was joined as a second respondent to these proceedings by an order of the Registrar on the basis that these proceedings may affect his interests.
The documents that had been filed in Court were served upon Mr Rafailidis by Ken David Gray, as deposed to in his affidavit sworn 12 December 2014 which was filed in Court today. In addition, Mr Rafailidis was forwarded a…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Rafailidis v Roads and Maritime Services and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2015] NSWCA 143
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the Land and Environment Court had jurisdiction to hear the appeal under section 66 of the *Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Act 1991* (NSW), specifically in circumstances where no question of law was raised.
The Court of Appeal held that section 66 of the *Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Act 1991* (NSW) conferred jurisdiction on the Land and Environment Court to hear appeals from decisions of the Land Valuation Tribunal only where a question of law was involved. As no question of law was identified in the present appeal, the Court found that the Land and Environment Court lacked the necessary jurisdiction.
Consequently, the appeal against the judgment of Craig J delivered on 11 February 2014 was dismissed, and the application for leave to appeal against the judgment of Sheahan J delivered on 18 March 2014 was refused.
Orders
Orders of the court
The appeal against the judgment of Craig J delivered on 11 February 2014 is dismissed.
The application for leave to appeal against the judgment of Sheahan J delivered on 18 March 2014 is refused.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.