Rafailidis v Roads and Maritime Services

Link copied
Case Copied 13 min read


Court of Appeal
Supreme Court

New South Wales

Case Name: 

Rafailidis v Roads and Maritime Services

Medium Neutral Citation: 

[2015] NSWCA 143

Hearing Date(s): 

12 May 2015

Decision Date: 

12 May 2015

Before: 

Beazley P at [1];
Basten JA at [27];
Ward JA at [32]

Decision: 

The appeal against the judgment of Craig J delivered on 11 February 2014 is dismissed.

The application for leave to appeal against the judgment of Sheahan J delivered on 18 March 2014 is refused.

Catchwords: 

COMPULSORY ACQUISITION – Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Act 1991 (NSW), s 66 – jurisdiction of the Land and Environment Court – no question of law

Legislation Cited: 

Constitution Act 1902 (NSW), s 5
The Constitution, ss 51(xxxi), 106, 107, 108, 109
Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (NSW), s 66
Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW), ss 19, 24, 25, 57
Judiciary Act 1903 (NSW), s 78B
Roads Act 1993 (NSW)
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 36

Cases Cited: 

Durham Holdings Pty Ltd v The State of New South Wales [2001] HCA 7; 205 CLR 399
Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; 205 CLR 337
Johnson v Johnson [2000] HCA 48; 201 CLR 488
R v MSK and MAK [2004] NSWCCA 308; 61 NSWLR 204

Category: 

Principal judgment

Parties: 

Koula Rafailidis (Applicant and Appellant)
Roads and Maritime Services (First Respondent)
Efrem Rafailidis (Second Respondent)

Representation: 

Counsel:
In person (Applicant and Appellant)
N Eastman (First Respondent)

Solicitors:
In person (Applicant and Appellant)
Clayton Utz (First Respondent)

File Number(s): 

2014/102141

Decision under appeal: 

 Court or Tribunal: 

Land and Environment Court

  Jurisdiction: 

Class 3

  Citation: 

Rafailidis v Roads and Maritime Services (No 2) [2014] NSWLEC 9; Rafailidis v Roads and Maritime Services (No 3) [2014] NSWLEC 21

  Date of Decision: 

11 February 2014; 18 March 2014

  Before: 

Craig J; Sheahan J

  File Number(s): 

2013/30195

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]

JUDGMENT

  1. BEAZLEY P: The appellant, Mrs Koula Rafailidis, challenges two decisions of the Land and Environment Court relating to the compulsory acquisition of land pursuant to the Roads Act 1993 (NSW) and the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (NSW).

  2. Mr Ephram Rafailidis, the joint owner of the land with Mrs Rafailidis, was joined as a second respondent to these proceedings by an order of the Registrar on the basis that these proceedings may affect his interests.

  3. The documents that had been filed in Court were served upon Mr Rafailidis by Ken David Gray, as deposed to in his affidavit sworn 12 December 2014 which was filed in Court today. In addition, Mr Rafailidis was forwarded a…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Rafailidis v Roads and Maritime Services and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2015] NSWCA 143
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appeal concerned a dispute between Mr Rafailidis and Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) regarding the compulsory acquisition of land. The matter came before the Court of Appeal of New South Wales, comprising Beazley P, Basten and Ward JJA.

The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the Land and Environment Court had jurisdiction to hear the appeal under section 66 of the *Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Act 1991* (NSW), specifically in circumstances where no question of law was raised.

The Court of Appeal held that section 66 of the *Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Act 1991* (NSW) conferred jurisdiction on the Land and Environment Court to hear appeals from decisions of the Land Valuation Tribunal only where a question of law was involved. As no question of law was identified in the present appeal, the Court found that the Land and Environment Court lacked the necessary jurisdiction.

Consequently, the appeal against the judgment of Craig J delivered on 11 February 2014 was dismissed, and the application for leave to appeal against the judgment of Sheahan J delivered on 18 March 2014 was refused.

Orders

Orders of the court

The appeal against the judgment of Craig J delivered on 11 February 2014 is dismissed.

The application for leave to appeal against the judgment of Sheahan J delivered on 18 March 2014 is refused.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.