| [2015] FWCA 7205 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Radploy Pty Ltd T/A Lake Imaging
(AG2015/5203)
LAKE IMAGING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT - MEDICAL RECEPTION STAFF - BALLARAT REGION - 2015
Health and welfare services | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMILTON | MELBOURNE, 20 OCTOBER 2015 |
Application for approval of the Lake Imaging Enterprise Agreement - Medical Reception Staff - Ballarat Region - 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Lake Imaging Enterprise Agreement - Medical Reception Staff - Ballarat Region – 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Radploy Pty Ltd t/as Lake Imaging. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement was approved on 20 October 2015 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 27 October 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2019.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE416249 PR573086>
- AGLC
- Radploy Pty Ltd T/A Lake Imaging [2015] FWCA 7205
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 7205
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009 and the Fair Work Regulations 2009. Specifically, the Commission had to assess whether the agreement contained terms that were contrary to the provisions of the Act, whether it provided for the resolution of genuine workplace disputes, and whether it met the genuine agreement and public interest tests. The Commission also considered whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it provided for the proper protection of employees.
The Commission found that the agreement did not contain any terms that were contrary to the Act. It concluded that the agreement provided for the resolution of genuine workplace disputes through a dispute resolution process that included a requirement for the parties to first attempt to resolve the dispute through negotiation. The Commission determined that the agreement was made in good faith and that it provided for the proper protection of employees. The Commission also found that the agreement met the public interest test. Accordingly, the Commission approved the Lake Imaging Enterprise Agreement 2015.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.