[2013] FWCA 218 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Racing and Wagering Western Australia (RWWA)
(AG2013/4247)
RWWA GENERAL STAFF AGREEMENT 2012
State and Territory government administration | |
COMMISSIONER CLOGHAN | PERTH, 14 JANUARY 2013 |
Application for approval of the RWWA General Staff Agreement 2012.
[1] On 7 January 2013, Racing and Wagering Western Australia made application for approval of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the RWWA General Staff Agreement 2012 (“the Agreement”). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the FW Act”).
[2] The Agreement was made following a ballot on 24 December 2012.
[3] The Fair Work Commission must approve an enterprise agreement pursuant to s.186 of the FW Act if the requirements set out in that section, s.187 and s.188 are met.
[4] I am satisfied, from the material provided to the Commission, that ss.186, 187 and 188, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[5] The Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU) has declared that the CPSU was a bargaining representative for the Agreement and is entitled to represent the industrial interests of those employees in accordance with paragraph 176(1)(b) of the FW Act. Further, the CPSU supports the approval of the Agreement by the Commission and has read and agrees with the Employer’s statutory declaration in support of the application, insofar as it is within the Union’s knowledge. Finally, the CPSU has given notice that, pursuant to s.183 of the FW Act, it wants to be covered by the Agreement.
[6] The Agreement is approved and will, in accordance with s.54(1) of the FW Act, operate from 21 January 2013.
[7] The nominal expiry date of this Agreement is 1 September 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE899286 PR533065>
- AGLC
- Racing and Wagering Western Australia (RWWA) [2013] FWCA 218
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 218
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the proposed agreement met the statutory requirements under the Industrial Relations Act 1979. This involved an examination of whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated, contained appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms, and complied with the relevant provisions of the Act. The court also had to consider whether the agreement provided adequate protections for the employees while balancing the interests of the employer.
The court determined that the RWWA General Staff Agreement 2012 did not meet the statutory requirements for approval. The court found that the agreement had not been genuinely negotiated as it failed to include provisions that addressed the union's concerns about job security and redundancy. Additionally, the court held that the agreement did not contain suitable dispute resolution mechanisms, which is a mandatory requirement under the Act. The court concluded that the agreement did not adequately balance the interests of both parties and did not provide sufficient protections for employees. Consequently, the application for approval was dismissed.
The final orders of the court were that the RWWA General Staff Agreement 2012 did not meet the statutory requirements and was not approved. The court directed the parties to continue negotiations to reach an agreement that satisfied the legal requirements and adequately addressed the concerns of both parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.