R v Zhou

Case [2020] NSWDC 343


District Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Zhou [2020] NSWDC 343
Hearing dates: 6 March 2020
Decision date: 06 March 2020
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: King SC DCJ
Decision:

Convicted.

Sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of 4 years comprising a NPP of 2 years and 6 months to commence 24/8/18 and expire on 23/2/21 and a balance of term of 1 year and 6 months to commence on 24/2/21 and expire on 23/8/22.

Catchwords:

CRIME – Sentence - recklessly cause grievous bodily harm – injuries to victim – aggravating feature - seriousness of offence – subjective matters

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1900

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Cases Cited:

R v Chisari [2006] NSWCCA 19

R v Dickinson [2004] NSWCCA 457

R v Hampton [1999] NSWCCA 341

Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383

Category:Sentence
Parties: Regina
Zhou, Zhanlong
Representation:

Counsel:
Defence: Mr M Breeze

Solicitors:
Crown: Ms I Maxwell-Williams
Defence: Ms Sarah Rashidi, Alpha Law Practice
File Number(s): 2018/00261306

Judgment

  1. In this matter, Zhanlong Zhou appears for sentence in respect of a single offence, being recklessly cause grievous bodily harm contrary to s 35(2) of the Crimes Act 1900. The maximum penalty provided is 10 years’ imprisonment and there is a standard non-parole period of four years. Although this was a plea of guilty, the standard non-parole period remains relevant as a guidepost.

  2. The offender was committed for sentence on 11 December 2019 from the Burwood Local Court. The plea of guilty was at the earliest opportunity and he is accordingly entitled to a discount for the utility of the plea alone of 25%. Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383.

  3. The date of the offence was 23 August 2018 and he was arrested on the following day, 24 August 2018. He has been in custody since 24 August 2018 until today, only in relation to this offence. Accordingly, I note that the sentence imposed will commence from the date of his arrest, 24 August 2018.

  4. The facts are agreed and are as follows:

BACKGROUND

  1. The offender, who is now 32 years of age, and the victim, Mr Dong, who was some five years younger than the offender, knew each other. They are both Chinese nationals and were employed as gyp-rockers in Australia.

  2. The victim and the offender would often meet in social settings, sharing meals and drinks and on occasion playing cards together. They also worked together. Another friend, a Mr Song, would often meet up with them and they would socialise.

THE OFFENCE

  1. On 23 August 2018, the offender finished work between 4.30 and 5pm. He and Mr Song shared a lift with two other co-workers to a noodle restaurant known as “Master Guo” on Beamish Street, Campsie. Once there, the four men contributed to the purchase of a case of 24 Chinese brand beers, the alcohol by volume being 4.5%, which amounted to 1.2 standard drinks per bottle or can, and a Chinese brand wine which had…

Continue reading R v Zhou

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Zhou [2020] NSWDC 343
Case
[2020] NSWDC 343
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of R v Zhou involved the defendant, Zhou, who was convicted of recklessly causing grievous bodily harm. The court had to determine the appropriate sentence for Zhou, taking into account the severity of the injuries inflicted on the victim. The case was heard in a higher court where the focus was on the legal issues surrounding the sentence, particularly the aggravating factors and the overall seriousness of the offence.

The primary legal issue the court needed to address was the appropriate length and structure of the sentence for Zhou's crime. The court had to consider the subjective matters involved in assessing the gravity of the offence and the necessity to ensure the punishment was proportionate to the harm caused. The judge also had to evaluate the circumstances leading to the offence and any mitigating factors that could influence the final sentencing decision.

The court's reasoning involved a detailed examination of the injuries sustained by the victim and the level of recklessness displayed by Zhou. The judge acknowledged the severity of the harm caused, which necessitated a substantial custodial sentence. The court also considered the balance between deterrence and rehabilitation, ultimately determining that a total term of imprisonment of 4 years was appropriate. The sentence was structured to include a non-parole period of 2 years and 6 months, followed by a balance of 1 year and 6 months. This decision reflected the court's view that while the crime was serious, there was also a need to provide Zhou with an opportunity for rehabilitation after serving the non-parole period.

The final orders of the court were that Zhou be sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of 4 years, with a non-parole period of 2 years and 6 months, followed by a balance of 1 year and 6 months. The sentence was to commence on the specified dates, ensuring that Zhou would serve a significant period of incarceration before being eligible for release.

Orders

Orders of the court

Convicted.

Sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of 4 years comprising a NPP of 2 years and 6 months to commence 24/8/18 and expire on 23/2/21 and a balance of term of 1 year and 6 months to commence on 24/2/21 and expire on 23/8/22.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.