CITATION: R v Woods, Jacob [2008] NSWDC 177 HEARING DATE(S): 09/04/08
JUDGMENT DATE:
2 June 2008JURISDICTION: Criminal JUDGMENT OF: Nicholson SC DCJ DECISION: Convicted on all counts.
Overall sentence amounts to aprox 6years; overall non parole period amounts to 4 years.CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - Sentencing - Sexual intercourse and other offences - prepubescent male victims (x3) - 10 episodes of offending - offending period 2 years - Aboriginal community - assessing mid-range of seriousness - fiarearm ofences - .22 calibre rifle - faulty working condition - unlicenced - strong subjectibve circumstances. LEGISLATION CITED: Firearms Act 1996 CASES CITED: Gladue v The Queen (1999) 1 SCR 688 [80]
R v Rushby (1977) NSWLR 597
R v Hayes [1984] 1 NSWLR 740
R v Cuthbert (1967) 2 NSWR 329PARTIES: Regina
Jacob WoodsFILE NUMBER(S): 07/61/0100 COUNSEL: J Thompson for Offender SOLICITORS: Mr J. May ODDP Dubbo for Crown
JUDGMENT
1. Most adults have an interest in forming and pursuing sexual attraction to another person or persons. In general this interest is of no great moment to the criminal law. There are at least two crucial exceptions to this proposition; where there is an absence of consent the criminal law regards persistent pursuit of such an interest as anti-social conduct of such a degree that it amounts to criminal behaviour.
2. The second exception relates to children under sixteen and others of equivalent status, who are psycho-sexually immature lacking understanding of sexual options and appreciation of the significance and consequences of sexual relations whether casual or long established. As a child matures and comes to some understanding of the inequality of personal sophistication between himself and the adult, the power imbalance that existed between them, the measure of inappropriateness of sexual contact between them and the self-centred sexual greed and avarice of the adult in taking such advantage of the child, whatever pleasure that child may initially have taken from the experience can and should turn to resentment, outrage and a justified feeling of sexual exploitation and defilement. Equally, the criminal law regards the sexual exploitation of children and vulnerable adults as abhorrent anti-social behaviour of a high order.
3. There is little doubt that Jacob Charles Woods long before 16 January realised the abhorrent anti-social nature of his sexual relations with three of Bourke’s young Aboriginal boys; NB born 1995, DG born 1996 and ME born 1998. By January 5 2007 police were aware he had been showing pornographic videos to young Aboriginal boys and suspected him of having indecent dealings with NB. Police searched his premises. Items of interest to them were a .22 calibre rifle, ammunition and pornographic videocassettes. Police found material confirming their interests in these items was well founded.
4. They also found a suicide note. Among its contents was recognition by Woods that he required help, needed counselling services and expression of remorse, “for doing it”. A suicide attempt shortly before the search had failed because of a mechanical fault in the rifle. There…
Continue reading R v Woods, Jacob
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Woods, Jacob [2008] NSWDC 177
- Case
- [2008] NSWDC 177
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were the determination of an appropriate sentence for the sexual offences and the consideration of the firearm-related charges in the sentencing process. The court had to weigh the seriousness of the sexual crimes, the number of victims, and the defendant's prior criminal history, including the possession of an unregistered and unsafe firearm. The court also needed to decide on the non-parole period, balancing the need for punishment, deterrence, and rehabilitation.
The court found that the mid-range of seriousness was appropriate for the sexual offences, considering the significant harm caused to the victims and the defendant's repeated offending behaviour. The court also took into account the subjective circumstances, including the defendant's standing in the Aboriginal community, which was seen as a mitigating factor. The firearm-related offences were considered in the sentencing process, although the court noted that the rifle was not operational at the time of the offences. The court ultimately determined an overall sentence of approximately six years, with a non-parole period of four years.
The final orders of the court were that the defendant be convicted on all counts. The overall sentence amounted to approximately six years, with a non-parole period of four years. This reflects the court's consideration of the seriousness of the offences, the impact on the victims, and the mitigating factors present in the case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Convicted on all counts. Overall sentence amounts to aprox 6years; overall non parole period amounts to 4 years.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.