District Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Wood [2019] NSWDC 778 Hearing dates: 8 – 11 October 2019 Date of orders: 11 October 2019 Decision date: 11 October 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: M L Williams SC DCJ Decision: Verdicts of guilty on counts 1 – 5, and not guilty on count 6: at [79].
Catchwords: CRIME — Firearms offences — Use/Possess prohibited pistol/firearm - operation of s 4A of the Firearms Act 1996
CRIME — Money laundering — Dealing with money suspected of being proceeds of crime
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Trial — Judge aloneLegislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986
Firearms Act 1996Cases Cited: Clout v R (1995) 41 NSWLR 312
Fernando v The Queen [1999] NSWCCA 66
Fleming v The Queen (1998) 197 CLR 250
Lowe v R (1997) 98 A Crim R 300
May v The Queen [2012] NSWCCA 250
R v Baden-Clay [2016] HCA 35
R v Winningham unreported NSWCCA 10 May 1995Texts Cited: Nil
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Crown)
Mason Wood (Accused)Representation: Ms L Hanshaw (Solicitor Advocate for the Crown)
Mr D Roff (Counsel for the Accused)
File Number(s): 2018/171059
Judgment
-
The accused, Mason Wood, has pleaded not guilty, in a trial by judge alone, to an indictment containing six counts:
Count 1: On 31 May 2018, at East Gosford, he possessed a shortened firearm (#250991), that was not a pistol, without being authorised to do so, contrary to s 62(1)(b) of the Firearms Act1996..
Count 2: On 31 May 2018, at East Gosford, he possessed a shortened firearm (#408297), that was not a pistol, without being authorised to do so, contrary to s 62(1)(b) of the Firearms Act 1996
Count 3: On 31 May 2018, at East Gosford he possessed firearm namely namely, .22 Long Rifle calibre ANSCHUTZ Model 1450 bolt action repeating rifle (#1215599) not being authorised to do so, contrary to s 7A(1) of the Firearms Act 1996.
Count 4: On 31 May 2018, at East Gosford he possessed a firearm that was not registered, namely, .22 Long Rifle calibre ANSCHUTZ Model 1450 bolt action repeating rifle (#1215599) contrary to s 36(1) of the Firearms Act 1996.
Count 5: On 31 May 2018, at East Gosford, he possessed a firearm that was not registered namely, a shortened 12 gauge double barrel shotgun (#408297) contrary to s 36(1) of the Firearms Act 1996.
Count 6: On May 2018, at East Gosford did possess certain property namely, $4950 in Australian currency, in circumstance where that there are reasonable grounds to suspect that $4950 in Australian currency is the proceeds of crime.
Judge alone trial
-
Where an accused is tried without a jury, section 133 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 imposes certain obligations in relation to evidence relied upon by the Judge in reaching a verdict. That section provides:
133 Verdict of single Judge
(1) A Judge who tries criminal proceedings without a jury may make any finding that could have been…
Continue reading R v Wood
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Wood [2019] NSWDC 778
- Case
- [2019] NSWDC 778
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Verdicts of guilty on counts 1 – 5, and not guilty on count 6: at [79].
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.