R v Wilson

Link copied
Case Copied 7 min read

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION: R v Wilson [2000] QCA 318
PARTIES: THE QUEEN
V
WILSON, Kristy Marie
(applicant/appellant)
FILE NO/S: CA No 97 of 2000
DC No 409 of 2000
DC No 1909 of 1999
DIVISION: Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING: Sentence Application
ORIGINATING COURT:

District Court at Brisbane

DELIVERED ON: 8 August 2000
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARING DATE: 28 July 2000
JUDGES: McPherson and Davies JJA, Mullins J
Judgment of the Court
ORDER: Application for leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal allowed. Orders made on 6 April 2000 set aside. In lieu applicant sentenced to 12 months imprisonment to be served by way of an intensive correction order under s 114 of the Penalties and Sentences Act in the terms set out in the order of this Court.
CATCHWORDS:

CRIMINAL LAW – JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – JUDGMENT AND PUNISHMENT – SENTENCE – JUVENILE OFFENDERS – OTHER MATTERS – where applicant sentenced for similar offence of housebreaking committed while on parole – where trial judge ordered brief term of imprisonment – where release from gaol followed by no degree of supervision – whether personal circumstances of applicant would result in successful rehabilitation

Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld), s 114, s 115

COUNSEL: A W Moynihan for the applicant/appellant
L J Clare for the respondent
SOLICITORS: Legal Aid Queensland for the applicant/appellant
Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for the respondent
  1. THE COURT: Kristy Wilson applies for leave to appeal against sentences imposed in the District Court at Brisbane where she pleaded guilty on 6 April 2000 to a charge of entering a dwelling house with intent. The offence took place at Caboolture at about 5.30 pm on 16 October 1999.  A rock was thrown at and broke the glass panel of the door and the applicant's male companion is said to have entered and "ransacked" the house. In the result, however, nothing was taken from it.  Neighbours, who saw what was happening, called the police. When they arrived, the applicant, who was keeping watch outside, shouted out "Get out. The cops are here". The applicant escaped into nearby bushland, where she was found crouching in an effort to avoid detection.  She at first denied any part in the break-in, but later pleaded guilty. Her accomplice was successful in escaping.

  1. Her conviction of this offence had the effect of resurrecting an earlier offence of entering a dwelling house for which she had been sentenced in the District Court at Brisbane on 21 June 1999. That offence had been committed on 5 August 1998, when the applicant and another person had entered a dwelling house. Again, the place was ransacked. Food was thrown around and two carloads of property were removed.  At the sentence hearing on 21 June 1999, Shanahan CJ DC imposed a probation order for a period of three years. At the hearing on 6 April 2000 for the later offence committed on 6 October 1999, the learned sentencing judge revoked the probation order made on 21 June…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read R v Wilson and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2000] QCA 318
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of R v Wilson, the applicant was sentenced for a housebreaking offence committed while on parole for a similar offence. The trial judge imposed a brief term of imprisonment, which was followed by the applicant's release without any degree of supervision. The applicant sought leave to appeal against the sentence, arguing that his personal circumstances would result in successful rehabilitation if he were not subject to a custodial sentence.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the applicant's personal circumstances warranted a non-custodial sentence under the Penalties and Sentences Act. The court was required to consider the principles of sentencing, particularly those relating to juvenile offenders, and whether the applicant's rehabilitation prospects justified an alternative sentence.

The court granted the application for leave to appeal and allowed the appeal. It held that the applicant's personal circumstances and prospects of rehabilitation were such that a non-custodial sentence was appropriate. The court set aside the orders made on 6 April 2000 and, in lieu, sentenced the applicant to 12 months imprisonment to be served by way of an intensive correction order under section 114 of the Penalties and Sentences Act. The court specified the terms of the order in its judgment.

Orders

Orders of the court

Application for leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal allowed. Orders made on 6 April 2000 set aside. In lieu applicant sentenced to 12 months imprisonment to be served by way of an intensive correction order under s 114 of the Penalties and Sentences Act in the terms set out in the order of this Court.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.