R v Weaven

Case [2011] VSC 508


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA Not Restricted

AT MELBOURNE

CRIMINAL DIVISION

S CR 2010 0169

THE QUEEN
v
GLENN MATTHEW WEAVEN

JUDGE:

WEINBERG JA

WHERE HELD:

Melbourne

DATE OF HEARING:

25, 27 & 28 July, 2-5, 8-12 & 15-18 August 2011

DATE OF PLEA:

5 October 2011

DATE OF SENTENCE:

12 October 2011

CASE MAY BE CITED AS:

R v Weaven

MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION:

[2011] VSC 508

---

CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Murder – Female victim stabbed in neck – Body burnt to conceal offending – Whether aggravating factor –– Weight to be given to evidence of prior good character in light of offender being willing participant in criminality as part of ‘scenario’ operation – Combination of physical and mental ailments – Consequences of imprisonment more burdensome for offender – Sentence 20 years’ imprisonment – Non-parole period of 16 years fixed

---

APPEARANCES:

Counsel Solicitors
For the Crown Mr M Rochford SC with
Mr B L Sonnett (trial)

Mr C Hyland, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions

Mr G J C Silbert SC with
Mr B L Sonnett (plea)
For the Accused Mr G F Meredith with
Mr N Goodenough
Leanne Warren & Associates

HIS HONOUR:

  1. Glenn Matthew Weaven.  After a trial lasting some three weeks, you were found guilty of the murder of Mary Lou Cook at Narre Warren on 14 December 2008.

  1. The circumstances surrounding the commission of that offence may be briefly stated. 

  1. On Sunday 14 December 2008, shortly before 1:00 a.m, Ms Cook was stabbed to death at her home in Darling Way, Narre Warren.  The premises were subsequently set on fire.  You had had a longstanding relationship with the deceased.  Within a few days, you were suspected by police of having been involved in her murder. 

  1. On 18 December 2008, you willingly participated in an interview with Sergeant Ronald Iddles of the Homicide Squad.  You denied any involvement in the murder.  You claimed to have been at your parents’ home, some two kilometres from the scene of the crime, at the relevant time.  Sergeant Iddles considered that, although you were a suspect, there was insufficient evidence to charge you with murder at that stage.

  1. The investigation continued for some months.  Eventually, in July 2009, the police began a covert operation, using what is colloquially termed a ‘scenario’ method of investigation.  Between July and September 2009, you met with undercover police on a number of occasions.  Throughout that period, you took part in some 17 different ‘scenarios’, a number of them involving what you were led to believe was criminal activity.  Your belief was that you were participating in the activities of an organised criminal gang, and that you were being groomed for possible membership of that gang.  You were paid various amounts of money for your assistance in these ‘criminal’ activities, and were led to believe that there was opportunity to earn a great deal more. 

  1. On 18 September 2009, you met a man whom you knew as ‘Gary’ (in fact, an undercover police operative)…

Continue reading R v Weaven

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Weaven [2011] VSC 508
Case
[2011] VSC 508
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of R v Weaven involved the defendant, Weaven, who was convicted of murdering Mary Lou Cook by stabbing her in the neck and burning her body to conceal the crime. The matter was heard in a court of criminal jurisdiction, where the primary issue was to determine an appropriate sentence for the defendant, taking into consideration various aggravating and mitigating factors. The court needed to assess whether certain factors should be considered as aggravating, the weight to be given to the defendant’s evidence of prior good character, and the impact of the defendant’s physical and mental ailments on the sentencing.

The court examined whether the defendant's willingness to participate in the criminal act as part of a 'scenario' operation should be viewed as an aggravating factor. It also considered the implications of the defendant's prior good character and the potential increased burden of imprisonment due to his combination of physical and mental health issues. The court recognised that the defendant's ailments could make the consequences of imprisonment more burdensome, which needed to be factored into the sentencing decision. Ultimately, the court balanced these considerations and determined that an appropriate sentence was a term of 20 years' imprisonment, with a non-parole period set at 16 years.

The court's reasoning led to the imposition of a 20-year imprisonment term for the murder, with a non-parole period of 16 years. This decision reflected a comprehensive assessment of the aggravating and mitigating factors, including the nature of the crime, the defendant’s participation in the criminal activity, and his health conditions. The final orders mandated that Weaven serve a 20-year term for the murder of Mary Lou Cook, with a non-parole period of 16 years.

Orders

Orders of the court

For the murder of Mary Lou Cook, I sentence you to a term of 20 years’ imprisonment.  I fix a non-parole period of 16 years.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.