R v Tubby

Case [2025] NSWDC 153


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Tubby [2025] NSWDC 153
Hearing dates: 22 April 2025
Date of orders: 1 May 2025
Decision date: 02 May 2025
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Priestley SC DCJ
Decision:

(1) The offender is convicted of the offences set out at [102].

(2)   In respect of sequence 11 the offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 9 months with a non parole period of 6 months, to date from 2 May 2025.

(3)   In respect of sequences 4, 9, 12 and 16, and noting the indicative sentences set out above, the offender is sentenced to an aggregate term of 3 years imprisonment to date from 2 September 2025 and expiring 1 September 2028 and with the offender to be released after 8 months, on 1 May 2026, to be released on recognisance of $1 for a period of 2 years four months, expiring 1 September 2028 with the following conditions:

(a)   To be of good behaviour.

(b)   Be subject to the supervision of a probation officer appointed in accordance with the order; and

(c)   Obey all reasonable directions of the probation officer; and

(d)   Not travel interstate or overseas without the written permission of the probation officer; and

(e)   Undertake such treatment or rehabilitation programs that the probation officer reasonably directs.

Note forfeiture order made in accordance with separate minute of order dated 2 May 2025.

Catchwords:

CRIME — Child sex offences — Child abuse material — Using carriage service for child pornography material or child abuse material

Legislation Cited:

Commonwealth Crimes Act 1900

Commonwealth Criminal Code

Crime (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Crimes Act 1900

Cases Cited:

De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194

Hutchinson [2018] NSWCCA 152

R v Bredal [2024] NSWCCA 75

Category:Sentence
Parties: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Liam Michael Tubby (Offender
Representation:

Counsel:
Mr McGuiness for the Crown
Mr Cochrane for the Offender

Solicitors:
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions for the Crown
James Fuggle Rummery Solicitors for the Offender
File Number(s): 2024/00049645

JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. Liam Michael Tubby (“the offender”) appears for sentence in respect of four matters under the Commonwealth Criminal Code (CCC) and a further matter under the New South Wales Crimes Act. The offences are referred to in the exhibits by way of their sequence number. The below table sets out the five offences by reference to the sequence number, the section of the legislation, date of alleged offence, a brief statement as to what constitutes the offence and the maximum penalty. There is no standard non-parole period in respect of the New South Wales matter and there are no matters to be dealt with by way of either a Form 1 under NSW legislation or by way of a section 16BA schedule under the Commonwealth Crimes Act (CCA).

Seq

Sec

Date

Description

Max term

4

474.22(1)

2.5.23-21.1.24

Transmitted child abuse material (CAM)

15 yrs

9

474.22(1)

4.10.20-5.2.23

Accessed CAM

15 yrs

11

547E(2)

8.2.24

Possessed bestiality material

3 yrs

12

474.22A(1)

23.6.20-8.2.24

Continue reading R v Tubby

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Tubby [2025] NSWDC 153
Case
[2025] NSWDC 153
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of R v Tubby, the respondent, Tubby, faced charges related to using a carriage service to distribute child abuse material. The proceedings took place in a court of criminal jurisdiction, with the respondent being charged under the relevant Australian statutes concerning the use of carriage services for the distribution of child pornography or child abuse material. The prosecution alleged that Tubby had engaged in the distribution of such material across multiple sequences, each constituting a separate offence.

The central legal issues before the court were whether Tubby was guilty of the offences as charged and, if so, what the appropriate sentence should be. The court needed to determine if the prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt that Tubby had knowingly used a carriage service to distribute child abuse material and then consider the appropriate penalties and conditions for any sentences imposed.

The court found Tubby guilty on all counts. In its reasoning, the court considered the severity and nature of the offences, the respondent's criminal history, and the impact of the offences on the victims. The court noted the aggravating factors such as the distribution of such material and the number of sequences involved. The court imposed a sentence consisting of a term of imprisonment for one sequence and a suspended sentence for the others, with specific conditions attached to the suspended sentence including probation supervision, restrictions on travel, and participation in treatment or rehabilitation programs.

The final orders of the court were that Tubby was to serve a term of imprisonment for one sequence and a suspended sentence for the others, with specific conditions attached to the suspended sentence. The court also made a separate forfeiture order regarding the devices and materials used in the commission of the offences.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) The offender is convicted of the offences set out at [102].

(2) In respect of sequence 11 the offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 9 months with a non parole period of 6 months, to date from 2 May 2025.

(3) In respect of sequences 4, 9, 12 and 16, and noting the indicative sentences set out above, the offender is sentenced to an aggregate term of 3 years imprisonment to date from 2 September 2025 and expiring 1 September 2028 and with the offender to be released after 8 months, on 1 May 2026, to be released on recognisance of $1 for a period of 2 years four months, expiring 1 September 2028 with the following conditions:

(a) To be of good behaviour.

(b) Be subject to the supervision of a probation officer appointed in accordance with the order; and

(c) Obey all reasonable directions of the probation officer; and

(d) Not travel interstate or overseas without the written permission of the probation officer; and

(e) Undertake such treatment or rehabilitation programs that the probation officer reasonably directs.

Note forfeiture order made in accordance with separate minute of order dated 2 May 2025.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.