R v Tran

Case [2022] NSWDC 661


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Tran [2022] NSWDC 661
Hearing dates: 27 June 2022
Date of orders: 28 June 2022
Decision date: 28 June 2022
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Buscombe DCJ
Decision:

Impose an aggregate term of imprisonment of three years imprisonment, with a non-parole period of one year and ten months. The sentence commences on 16 July 2021 and expires on 15 July 2024. The non-parole period expires on 15 May 2023. N.B: The commencement date was corrected to 16 June 2021 under the Slip rule on 16 December 2022.

Catchwords:

CRIME – Violent offences – Armed robbery – Offensive weapon

SENTENCING – Subjective considerations on sentence – Age of offender

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1914 (NSW), s 94(a), s 97(1), s 249K(1)(a)

Cases Cited:

Bugmy v R [2013] HCA 37 249 CLR 571

Bullock v R [2016] NSWCCA 131

R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111

Bullock v R [2016] NSWCCA 131

Millwood v R [2012] NSWCCA 21

Category:Sentence
Parties:

Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP)

Jimmy Tran (Offender)
Representation:

Solicitors:

Mr P Clayton (Crown)

Mr Nashed (Offender)
File Number(s): 2021/00011351
2021/00157920

SENTENCE

Introduction

  1. The offender, Mr Jimmy Tran, stands to be sentenced having pleaded guilty to the following offences. Firstly, that on 28 December 2020, at Cabramatta, being armed with an offensive weapon, namely, a knife, he assaulted Adrian Gougiou with intent to rob him. That is an offence under s 97(1) of the Crimes Act and has a maximum penalty of 20 years’ imprisonment.

  2. The second offence is that on 13 May 2021, at Belmore, he robbed Kimberley Ngo of certain property, namely one Commonwealth Bank MasterCard, one Western Sydney University student identification card, one Health Care card and a New South Wales learner’s driver’s licence, all of which we're in Ms Ngo’s name. That is an offence under s 94(a) of the Crimes Act and has a maximum penalty of 14 years’ imprisonment.

  3. The third offence is that between 16 May 2021 and 31 May 2021, at Sydney, he made unwarranted demands with menaces with the intention of obtaining a financial gain from Kimberley Ngo. That is an offence under s 249K(1)(a) of the Crimes Act and has a maximum penalty of ten years’ imprisonment.

  4. None of the offences have an applicable standard non‑parole period. When sentencing the offender on the demand with menaces offence, he acknowledges his guilt of two offences that are on a form 1 and asks that I take those offences into account when I sentence him on that offence. Those two offences are offences of obtain property by deception, where the property was $5,097, and an offence of goods in custody.

The facts

  1. The facts are agreed and the following is taken from the agreed facts. In terms of the armed robbery matter, the victim was 20 years of age. At about 2 am on 28 December 2020, the victim used the phone application, Grindr, and he came across a profile for “JLE” and…

Continue reading R v Tran

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Tran [2022] NSWDC 661
Case
[2022] NSWDC 661
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appellant, Tran, was convicted of armed robbery for which he pleaded guilty. He was sentenced to imprisonment by the County Court of Victoria. Tran appealed against the length of his sentence, arguing it was excessive. The Court of Appeal for the Supreme Court of Victoria heard the appeal and assessed the sentence imposed by the County Court.

The appeal centred on the appropriate length of sentence for an armed robbery committed by a first offender. The court had to consider the subjective circumstances of the offender, including his age, and the objective circumstances of the offence, including the use of an offensive weapon. The appeal court considered whether the County Court had given appropriate weight to the mitigating factors, and whether the sentence imposed was excessive.

The Court of Appeal held that the County Court had considered the mitigating factors of Tran's age and lack of prior convictions. However, the Court of Appeal held that the County Court had not given sufficient weight to the use of an offensive weapon, which was a significant aggravating factor. The Court of Appeal considered that the sentence imposed was excessive and ordered a reduced sentence of three years imprisonment with a non-parole period of one year and ten months. The Court of Appeal further ordered that the sentence commence on 16 June 2021 and expire on 15 June 2024, with the non-parole period expiring on 15 April 2023.

Orders

Orders of the court

Impose an aggregate term of imprisonment of three years imprisonment, with a non-parole period of one year and ten months. The sentence commences on 16 July 2021 and expires on 15 July 2024. The non-parole period expires on 15 May 2023. N.B: The commencement date was corrected to 16 June 2021 under the Slip rule on 16 December 2022.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.