R v Tobin

Case [2019] NSWDC 100


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Tobin [2019] NSWDC 100
Hearing dates: 08 March 2019
Date of orders: 08 March 2019
Decision date: 08 March 2019
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Grant DCJ
Decision:

Aggregate term of imprisonment for 3 years
Licence disqualification for 12 months

Catchwords: CRIME — Driving offences — Dangerous driving occasioning grievous bodily harm
SENTENCING — Penalties — Imprisonment
Cases Cited: R v Manok [2017] NSWCCA 232
R v Pullen [2018] NSWCCA 264
The Queen v Whyte [2002] 55 NSWLR 252
Category:Sentence
Parties: Regina (Crown)
Scott Andrew Tobin (Offender)
Representation: Counsel:
Ms S Sloane (Crown)
Mr P Lange (Offender)
File Number(s): 2017/00208274

SENTENCE

HIS HONOUR:

Introduction

  1. Scott Andrew Tobin appears before me and has pleaded guilty to one count of dangerous driving occasioning grievous bodily harm contrary to s 52A(3)(a) of the Crimes Act where the maximum penalty is seven years imprisonment. There is no standard non-parole period.

  2. He has also pleaded guilty to fail to stop and assist after impact causing grievous bodily harm contrary to s 52AB(2) of the Crimes Act, the maximum penalty seven years imprisonment. There is no standard non-parole period.

  3. The statutory maximum periods are a yardstick for a sentencing judge. A judge should steer by them but not aim for them.

FACTS

  1. There is an agreed facts document in this case which reads as follows:

“COLLISION

(1) The victim in this matter is Michael James Robert Bruce born 9 May 1986.

(2) On the afternoon of Sunday 9 July 2017, Bruce drove his motor cycle, Harley Davidson registration GUN 55 from the Penrith area of Kellyville and then returned. He travelled with a group of friends who also rode motor cycles.

(3) At about 3.20pm, the group drove at the speed limit of 60 kilometres per hour in a westerly direction in a single file along Coreen Avenue at Penrith. At the head of the group was Vince Matuloivic. He was followed by Gavin Milan, Glen Ricketts and Christopher Tsardakidis. Bruce was at the rear of the group.

(4) At the same time, the offender drove white Toyota Hilux utility registration CL-92-KR in an easterly direction along Coreen Avenue, Penrith. Joshua King was seated in the front passenger seat. The vehicle had a large amount of concreting equipment strapped in the rear cargo tray. The vehicle is registered to the offender.

(5) As the offender drove his vehicle along a straight section of road, when about 150 metres from Tsardakidis, he drove his vehicle towards the westbound lane. He crossed double, unbroken dividing lines between the eastbound and westbound lanes. Tsardakidis was required to turn his motor cycle onto the shoulder at the side of the westbound lane to avoid colliding with the offender’s utility. Ricketts, following Tsardakidis, was also required to turn to the shoulder to avoid the utility.

(6) The offender continued to drive across the westbound lane and shoulder. Bruce attempted to avoid collision by turning into the shoulder of the road. The front…

Continue reading R v Tobin

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Tobin [2019] NSWDC 100
Case
[2019] NSWDC 100
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The defendant, Mr. Tobin, faced a criminal trial in the Supreme Court of Victoria for dangerous driving that resulted in grievous bodily harm. The incident occurred when Mr. Tobin, while driving under the influence of alcohol, collided with another vehicle, causing significant injuries to the driver of the other car. The court was tasked with determining the appropriate penalty for Mr. Tobin's actions, considering both the nature of the offence and the circumstances surrounding it.

The primary legal issue before the court was to establish the correct penalty for Mr. Tobin's dangerous driving, which caused serious physical harm. The court also needed to weigh various sentencing principles, including the deterrence of such behaviour, the protection of the community, and the rehabilitation of the offender. Additionally, the court had to consider the mandatory minimum sentencing provisions applicable to driving offences that result in grievous bodily harm.

In delivering the judgment, the court found that Mr. Tobin's actions demonstrated a clear disregard for the safety of others on the road. The court noted the significant harm caused to the victim and the fact that Mr. Tobin had a prior criminal history, which included previous driving-related offences. The court determined that an aggregate term of imprisonment for three years was appropriate, taking into account the seriousness of the offence and the need for general deterrence. The court also imposed a disqualification from holding a driver's licence for 12 months, in line with the statutory requirements for such driving offences.

Orders

Orders of the court

Aggregate term of imprisonment for 3 years

Licence disqualification for 12 months

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.