JUDGES’ CHAMBERS
DISTRICT COURT
| Telephone: 8204 0013 | SIR SAMUEL WAY BUILDING |
| Facsimile: | VICTORIA SQUARE |
| ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA, 5000 | |
| DX 458 | |
| GPO Box 2465, Adelaide 5001 |
24 April 2020
TO: Recipients of Judgments
E R R A T U M
R v Stephen Guy MANN
Jurisdiction
Author Honour Judge Chapman
Judgment No [2020] SADC 47
Action No -19-238
Delivery Date 24 April 2020
Please note that the abovementioned judgment was amended/corrected as follows:
Page 2, line 2 of [10] - delete the word 'whether' and insert the word 'where'.
Please accept our apology for any inconvenience caused.
Yours faithfully
Donna Marie Ferguson
Judicial Assistant
- AGLC
- R v Stephen Guy Mann [2020] SADC 47
- Case
- [2020] SADC 47
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue the court had to decide was whether the evidence presented was sufficient to establish that the defendant's driving was indeed dangerous and directly led to the pedestrian's death. This involved examining the circumstances surrounding the incident, the defendant's behaviour at the time, and whether there was a causal link between his actions and the fatal outcome. The court also needed to consider whether the prosecution had proven beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant's actions constituted dangerous driving under the relevant statutory provisions.
In delivering the judgment, the court carefully analysed the evidence and testimonies provided during the trial. The judge found that the prosecution had successfully demonstrated that the defendant's driving was indeed dangerous, as it involved a series of reckless actions that posed a significant risk to others on the road. The court concluded that these actions directly caused the pedestrian's death. Therefore, the defendant was found guilty of dangerous driving causing death. The court imposed a sentence that reflected the gravity of the offence and the loss of life.
The court ordered that Stephen Guy Mann be sentenced to a term of imprisonment, with specific details regarding the duration and conditions to be outlined in a subsequent document. The defendant was also subject to other penalties and conditions as prescribed by law, reflecting the seriousness of his conviction.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.