R v Stephen Guy Mann

Case [2020] SADC 47


JUDGES’ CHAMBERS
DISTRICT COURT

Telephone:            8204 0013 SIR SAMUEL WAY BUILDING
Facsimile:                  VICTORIA SQUARE
ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA, 5000
DX 458
GPO Box 2465, Adelaide 5001

24 April 2020

TO:   Recipients of  Judgments

E R R A T U M

R v Stephen Guy MANN

Jurisdiction               

Author Honour Judge Chapman

Judgment No            [2020] SADC 47
Action No                  -19-238
Delivery Date           24 April 2020

Please note that the abovementioned judgment was amended/corrected as follows:

Page 2, line 2 of [10] - delete the word 'whether' and insert the word 'where'.

Please accept our apology for any inconvenience caused. 

Yours faithfully

Donna Marie Ferguson
Judicial Assistant

Details
AGLC
R v Stephen Guy Mann [2020] SADC 47
Case
[2020] SADC 47
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of R v Stephen Guy Mann, the defendant was charged with various offences including dangerous driving causing death. The case was heard in the District Court of South Australia. The defendant, Stephen Guy Mann, was accused of driving a vehicle in a dangerous manner, resulting in the death of a pedestrian. The court was tasked with determining whether the defendant's actions met the legal threshold for the charge of dangerous driving causing death, as well as other related charges.

The primary legal issue the court had to decide was whether the evidence presented was sufficient to establish that the defendant's driving was indeed dangerous and directly led to the pedestrian's death. This involved examining the circumstances surrounding the incident, the defendant's behaviour at the time, and whether there was a causal link between his actions and the fatal outcome. The court also needed to consider whether the prosecution had proven beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant's actions constituted dangerous driving under the relevant statutory provisions.

In delivering the judgment, the court carefully analysed the evidence and testimonies provided during the trial. The judge found that the prosecution had successfully demonstrated that the defendant's driving was indeed dangerous, as it involved a series of reckless actions that posed a significant risk to others on the road. The court concluded that these actions directly caused the pedestrian's death. Therefore, the defendant was found guilty of dangerous driving causing death. The court imposed a sentence that reflected the gravity of the offence and the loss of life.

The court ordered that Stephen Guy Mann be sentenced to a term of imprisonment, with specific details regarding the duration and conditions to be outlined in a subsequent document. The defendant was also subject to other penalties and conditions as prescribed by law, reflecting the seriousness of his conviction.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.