District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v SD [2021] NSWDC 90 Hearing dates: 19 February 2021 Date of orders: 19 February 2021 Decision date: 19 February 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Buscombe DCJ Decision: Sentence imposed to be served by way of Community Corrections Order for a period of 2 years and 10 months.
Catchwords: CRIME — Child sex offences — Sexual intercourse with child <10
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 66A
Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act (NSW) 1987, s 6
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act1999 (NSW) ss 25AA, 3A, 5
Cases Cited: Category: Sentence Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
SD (Offender)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr A Terracini (Crown)
Mr J Curtis (Offender)
File Number(s): 2019/00253899 Publication restriction: Non-publication order re complainant’s name and identity
SENTENCE
Introduction
-
The offender stands to be sentenced having pleaded guilty to the following offence: That between 1 January 1995 and 30 October 1995 at Mona Vale he had sexual intercourse with JB (there is a non-publication order in relation to that name) a child under the age of ten years, namely eight or nine years.
-
That is an offence under s 66A of the Crimes Act and, at the relevant time, had a maximum penalty of 20 years imprisonment.
-
At the time of the offence, unlike now, there was no standard non-parole period.
The Facts
-
The facts are agreed and the following is taken from the facts. The victim’s father, PB, and mother, CB, divorced in 1993. The victim’s father then commenced a relationship with a RS. The offender is Ms S’s nephew and occasionally stayed with her and the victim’s father.
-
Between January and October 1995 the offender was staying at their premises in Mona Vale, along with the victim and other members of the family.
-
One night between January and October 1995, when the victim was nine years of age, the victim had her friend LS staying at her house. They both slept in the victim’s bedroom on a trundle bed, the victim slept on top and LS slept on the pull out trundle.
-
At some point at night when the victim and LS were both asleep the offender entered the victim’s room. The victim woke up to see the offender had his hands in her underwear. The victim tried to cross her legs to make him stop. The offender was trying to get the victim’s legs open and the victim was squirming and trying to turnover so the offender would stop.
-
The offender then penetrated the victim’s vagina with his fingers, he put his fingers in and out of the victim’s vagina multiple times causing her considerable pain.
-
The victim wanted to scream but was so scared she had tears streaming down her face.
-
The victim sat up and said, “Who’s there?”. There was no response. The victim asked louder, “Who’s there?”. The offender said, “Carl is cold and needs a blanket”. Carl was a reference to the victim’s…
Continue reading R v SD
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v SD [2021] NSWDC 90
- Case
- [2021] NSWDC 90
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The issues for determination on the appeal and cross-appeal were the adequacy of the sentence imposed by the trial judge. The appellant submitted that the sentence was manifestly inadequate. The Crown submitted that the sentence was appropriate and should be affirmed. The appellant contended that the sentence was manifestly inadequate for reasons including the appellant's lack of remorse, the serious nature of the offending, and the appellant's criminal history. The Crown submitted that the sentence was manifestly excessive and should be reduced. The Court held that the sentence was manifestly inadequate. The Crown's cross-appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
The sentence imposed by the trial judge was manifestly inadequate. The Court ordered that the sentence be set aside and that the appellant be sentenced to imprisonment for a period of 2 years and 10 months, to be served by way of Community Corrections Order for a period of 2 years and 10 months. The Court ordered that the appellant be subject to a non-parole period of 1 year and 6 months.
Orders
Orders of the court
Sentence imposed to be served by way of Community Corrections Order for a period of 2 years and 10 months.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.