R v Saunders

Case [2021] NSWDC 530


District Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Saunders [2021] NSWDC 530
Hearing dates: 26 March 2021, 7 May 2021
Date of orders: 12 May 2021
Decision date: 12 May 2021
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Bright DCJ
Decision:

Aggregate sentence of 3 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 1 year and 6 months

Catchwords:

SENTENCING — Mitigating factors — Remorse — Unlikely to re-offend

SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Domestic violence — Deterrence — General deterrence — Specific deterrence

SENTENCING — Subjective considerations on sentence — Hardship — Health issues — Special circumstances

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)

Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW)

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)

Cases Cited:

Attorney General’s Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146

CahyadivR (2007) 168 A Crim R 41; NSWCCA 1

LeevR (2019) NSWCCA 15

R vEdigarov (2001) 125 A Crim R 551

RvEdwards (1996) 90 A Crim R 510

RvKilic (2016) 259 CLR 256

Category:Sentence
Parties: Regina (Crown)
David Saunders (Offender)
Representation:

Counsel:
Ms A Cook (Offender)

Solicitors:
Ms M Wallis (ODPP)
Mr S Singh-Panwar (Offencer)
File Number(s): 2017/339313
Publication restriction: Nil

Judgment

  1. David Saunders, 52 years of age, appears for sentence in relation to the following four offences:

  • Count 1 - Intentionally choke and render unconscious and being reckless as to rendering unconscious (the victim being Sarah Foote), an offence pursuant to s 37(1), Crimes Act 1900 (NSW). The maximum prescribed penalty for this offence is 10 years imprisonment. There is no prescribed standard non‑parole period.

  • Count 4 - Assault occasioning actual bodily harm (the victim being Sarah Foote), an offence pursuant to s 59(1), Crimes Act. The maximum prescribed penalty for that offence is 5 years imprisonment. There is no prescribed standard non‑parole period. 

  • Counts 3 and 5 - Each offences of intimidation with intent to cause fear of physical or mental harm (the victims being Sarah Foote and Peter Fernance), an offence pursuant to s 13(1), Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW). The maximum prescribed penalty for that offence is 5 years imprisonment. There is no prescribed standard non‑parole period.

  1. When dealing with the offender for Count 1, the Court is taking into account on a Form 1, two further offences as follows:

  1. Intentionally choke, render unconscious and be reckless as to rendering unconscious (the victim being Sarah Foote), an offence pursuant to s 37(1), Crimes Act; and

  2. Intimidate with intent to cause fear of physical or mental harm (the victim being Peter Fernance), an offence pursuant to s 13(1), Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act.

  1. The victim Ms Foote is the offender's former partner. Their relationship had broken down in early 2017. All the offences involve either Ms Foote or her new partner Mr Peter Fernance. 

  2. The offender pleaded guilty on 1 February 2021 which was the first day of…

Continue reading R v Saunders

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Saunders [2021] NSWDC 530
Case
[2021] NSWDC 530
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the court involved a defendant, Saunders, who was convicted of domestic violence offences. The court was tasked with determining an appropriate sentence for the defendant. The court considered a range of mitigating factors, including the defendant's expressions of remorse and the likelihood of re-offending. The court also considered the need for general and specific deterrence, as well as the potential hardship of imprisonment on the defendant, who had significant health issues.

The legal issues before the court included the weight to be given to the mitigating factors, the appropriate level of deterrence, and the consideration of any special circumstances that might warrant a lesser sentence. The court examined the principles of sentencing for domestic violence and the broader objectives of the sentencing process. The court also had to balance the need for punishment with the potential for rehabilitation.

In delivering the sentence, the court found that while the defendant's remorse and health issues were mitigating factors, they did not outweigh the need for deterrence and punishment. The court determined that a sentence of imprisonment was necessary to achieve these objectives. The court set an aggregate sentence of three years, with a non-parole period of one year and six months. The court concluded that this sentence was appropriate given the nature of the offences and the need to protect the community.

Orders

Orders of the court

Aggregate sentence of 3 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 1 year and 6 months

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.