District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Salem Soukkar [2014] NSWDC 160 Hearing dates: 12 September 2014 Decision date: 26 September 2014 Before: Mahony SC DCJ Decision: Full time custodial aggregate sentence. For Orders see [75].
Catchwords: Multiple offences of robbery armed with an offensive weapon. Application of guideline judgment; aggregate sentences. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999Cases Cited: Cahadi v The Queen (2007) 168 A Crim R 41
Dougan v R (2006) 160 A Crim R 135
Pearce v The Queen 1998 194 CLR 610
R v Dougan (2006) 160 A Crim R 135
R v Ellis [2002] NSWCCA 211
R v Goundar (2001) 127 A Crim R 331
R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346
R v Rae [2013] NSWCCA 9
R v Sharma (2002) 54 NSWLR 300
R v Smith [2007] NSWCCA 100
R v Sok [2000] NSWCCA 121Category: Sentence Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Salem Soukkar (Offender)Representation: C Jones (Crown)
B Galloway (Offender)
File Number(s): 14/40626 14/96720 Publication restriction: Nil
REMARKS ON SENTENCE
Introduction
The offender has pleaded guilty to one count of attempted robbery armed with a dangerous weapon (H 54197162/1) and five counts of robbery armed with an offensive weapon (H 54197162/2-6).
Each of the charges is brought pursuant to s 97(2) of the Crimes Act 1900. Each carries a maximum penalty of 25 years imprisonment. There is no standard non-parole period.
The offender seeks to have two offences taken into consideration on a Form 1, pursuant to s 32 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999. The first is an offence of break, enter and steal pursuant to s 112(1) of the Crimes Act on 20 September 2013 at Como West Public School, and the second is a similar offence which occurred on 7 February 2014 at Santa Sabina School at Strathfield.
The offender entered pleas of guilty at committal on 27 February 2014 and it is common ground that he is entitled to a 25% utilitarian discount on sentence in respect of each charge.
The offender had originally pleaded guilty to one count of break, enter and steal at Como West Public School and one count of receiving stolen property (two Apple computers) from the Santa Sabina burglary. He was committed for sentence on both charges, however, on 9 May 2014 he provided a written statement to the investigating police admitting his involvement in the Santa Sabina burglary. The offender also gave information to the police about a co-accused involved in those burglaries. On 17 June 2014 the offender provided police with a second signed witness statement in respect of a co-accused involved in two armed robberies at the Caltex Service Station in December 2013, being Sequences 162/3 and 4. He has undertaken to give evidence consistent with those two signed statements at the trial of the co-accused.
The Sentence Hearing
The Crown tendered a bundle on sentence (exhibit A) which included a statement of facts, a pre-sentence report…
Continue reading R v Salem Soukkar
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Salem Soukkar [2014] NSWDC 160
- Case
- [2014] NSWDC 160
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court needed to weigh various factors, including the nature and circumstances of the offences, the defendant's criminal history, and the need to deter similar conduct in the future. The presiding judge had to ensure that the sentence reflected the seriousness of the crimes and provided adequate punishment while also considering the principles of proportionality and rehabilitation. The court was also required to apply the guidelines set by previous judgments to ensure consistency in sentencing for similar offences.
In delivering the judgment, the court emphasised the gravity of the defendant's actions, noting the use of an offensive weapon and the impact on the victims. The judge considered the guidelines provided by prior cases and determined that an aggregate sentence was warranted. The court imposed a full-time custodial sentence, reflecting the severity of the crimes and the need to protect the community. The final orders, detailed in the judgment, specified the aggregate sentence to be served by the defendant.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full time custodial aggregate sentence. For Orders see [75].
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.