CITATION: R v Robert PAVAN [2009] NSWDC 82 HEARING DATE(S): 1 May 2008
12 September 2008
24 April 2009
JUDGMENT DATE:
24 April 2009JURISDICTION: Criminal JUDGMENT OF: Berman SC DCJ DECISION: The offender is sentenced to imprisonment consisting of a non-parole period of seven and a half years and a total term of twelve years. CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - Sentence - Supply large commercial quantity of drugs PARTIES: The Crown
Robert Pavan
FILE NUMBER(S): DC 06/11/0336 COUNSEL: D Staehli SC (Crown)
B Stratton QC (Offender)SOLICITORS: NSW DPP
R.F Bergagnin & Co Solicitors
SENTENCE
1 HIS HONOUR: Robert Pavan pleaded guilty to an offence of supplying a large commercial quantity of cocaine. Encompassed within that offence were three separate transactions, each involving approximately a kilogram of cocaine. In each case the offender’s role was to identify purchasers of that large quantity and facilitate the supply of that cocaine from a Mr Big to someone who would then on-supply the drug, perhaps then in turn to others in the chain, before the drug was ultimately distributed to users.
2 The offender’s conduct extended over a relatively short time, but it was nevertheless gravely criminal. The offender took a significant role in the drug supply transactions, identifying purchasers and supervising the supply and payment. It is accepted that he must receive a significant period of imprisonment in order to reflect the criminality of his conduct.
3 He is now sixty years of age. He has some criminal history but there is nothing remotely approaching the seriousness of his present offending. His previous criminal history seems to have been related to his conduct involved in the racing industry. There were tendered today an impressive series of references from friends and family. It appears that the offender is in many respects a man of good character. He is prepared to go very much out of his way to assist his friends and family and has for many years been devoted and dedicated to his family’s upbringing.
4 When his first wife left he took over the sole care of his three children. He remarried but his second wife also left at about the same time that his daughter’s marriage broke down. In those circumstances his dedication to his children and grandchildren has been far beyond average. He managed to reach fifty-six years of age with only minor matters on his criminal history. That is testament to his underlying character and suggests among other things that he has good prospects of rehabilitation, and is unlikely to re-offend due in no small measure to the substantial support he will receive on release from custody.
5 The offender became involved in these transactions after meeting a man by the name of Hatfield. He was one of the Mr Bigs I referred to earlier. Hatfield together with two others, Leslie Mara and Michael Hurley, were involved in large-scale cocaine importation and distribution. Having a large quantity of cocaine in their possession, they needed to sell it for…
Continue reading R v Robert PAVAN
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Robert Pavan [2009] NSWDC 82
- Case
- [2009] NSWDC 82
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine the appropriate sentence for the defendant, considering both the aggravating and mitigating factors presented. The legal issues included the assessment of the quantity of drugs involved, the defendant's role in the drug supply chain, and the potential impact of imprisonment on the defendant and his family. Additionally, the court had to balance the need for general deterrence with the principles of individualised justice.
The court, in delivering its judgment, emphasised the gravity of the offence and the substantial quantity of drugs supplied by the defendant. It noted the significant harm caused by drug supply to individuals and the community. However, the court also considered the defendant's cooperation and his otherwise clean record. Ultimately, the court determined that a sentence of imprisonment was necessary to achieve the aims of punishment, deterrence, and rehabilitation. The court sentenced the offender to a non-parole period of seven and a half years and a total term of twelve years.
The final orders of the court mandated that the offender be imprisoned for a non-parole period of seven and a half years, with a total sentence of twelve years. The defendant was also subject to standard conditions of parole and other post-sentence supervision.
Orders
Orders of the court
The offender is sentenced to imprisonment consisting of a non-parole period of seven and a half years and a total term of twelve years.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.