R v Todd
[2024] NZHC 897
Citation 1
…e that undue delay in the disposition of a charge should work in favour of a prisoner being sentenced. The remarks of Sir Laurence Street in R v Todd (1982) 2 NSWLR 517 at p.519 and p.520 have not infrequently been adopted by this court upon the point. Again, the remarks to a similar effect of the Court of Criminal A…
R v Carmody
[2006] VSCA 139
Citation 2
(Para 16)
…159 In R v Carmody [2006] VSCA 139, at [16] and [17], particularly at [16], Chernov JA said,…
R v Skura
[2004] VSCA 53
Citation 3
(Para 48)
…82 In Skura [2004] VSCA 53, Smith JA observed at [48],…
R v Ly
[2004] VSCA 45
Citation 4
…46 In R v Ly & Ors (2004) VSCA 45, a case involving charges of affray and intentionally causing serious injury, the Court of Appeal stated at paragraph [30], “The substantive acts of unlawful violence which attract the penalty for intentionally causing serious injury constitute a large measure of the acts of unlawful…
R v Evans
[2003] VSCA 223
Citation 5
…to be recognised that a supervision order, as can be made in the Children's Court, is not an available sentencing option in your case. See R v Evans [2003] VSCA 223.…
R v Wright
[1998] VSCA 84
Citation 6
…67 In Mills [1998] 4 VR 235, at 241, Batt JA referred to 3 important considerations when sentencing youthful offenders:…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Lawrence
[2017] VCC 1869
Citation 7
…37 As was said in the DPP v Lawrence [2004] 10 VR 125 at paragraph 21, "The maximum penalty fixed by parliament shows how intrinsically serious the offence is considered to be on behalf of the community."…