District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Richardson [2022] NSWDC 596 Hearing dates: 16 December 2021 Date of orders: 28 January 2022 Decision date: 28 January 2022 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Bright DCJ Decision: Term of imprisonment of 2 years 7 months with a non-parole period of 1 year 3 months.
Catchwords: CRIME — Driving offences — Aggravated dangerous driving occasioning grievous bodily harm — Circumstances of aggravation — Driving under influence of illicit drugs
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)
Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions(Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194
Category: Sentence Parties: Rex (Crown)
Kyle Richardson (Accused)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr L Brasch (Accused)
Mr S Burton (Crown)
File Number(s): 2020/00133258 Publication restriction: NA
Judgment
-
Kyle Richardson, 20 years of age, appears before the Gosford District Court for sentence in relation to the following offences:
Aggravated dangerous driving (under the influence of drugs) occasioning grievous bodily harm, an offence pursuant to s 52A(4), Crimes Act. The maximum prescribed penalty for that offence is 11 years imprisonment. There is no standard non-parole period.
One offence on a s 166 certificate of drive whilst suspended (first offence), an offence pursuant to s 54(3)(a), Road Transport Act. The maximum prescribed penalty for that offence is six months imprisonment.
-
The offender pleaded guilty on 23 September 2021 at the Gosford Local Court. Having regard to the timing of the plea, I propose to allow a discount on sentence of 25%.
-
The offender has spent 177 days in custody. This period of time will be taken into account on sentence.
-
The offences were committed on 4 May 2020. The offender drove south on the M1 Motorway travelling at excessive speed and impaired by a combination of drugs. He lost control of his vehicle, colliding with a sandstone wall and seriously injured his passenger, Kelsey Gottl, his partner who was in the front passenger seat.
-
The offender had travelled from Toukley on the Central Coast to the scene of the collision, a distance of approximately 65 kilometres.
The Agreed Facts
-
Kyle Richardson, the offender, was 18 years and 11 months old at the time of the offending.
-
On 4 May 2020 he was the driver of a blue coloured Volkswagen Golf registered to a friend of his. Kelsey Gottl, the offender’s partner, was seated in the front passenger of the vehicle. At the time of the incident the offender was the holder of a New South Wales provisional P1 driver’s licence which was suspended as of 9 April 2020 until 8 July 2020.
-
The M1 Motorway Mooney Mooney in the vicinity of collision scene runs in a general north south direction with three lanes of traffic in each direction. Opposing lanes of traffic are separated by a rock wall. The speed limit of the section of roadway where the collision occurred is 90 kilometres…
Continue reading R v Richardson
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Richardson [2022] NSWDC 596
- Case
- [2022] NSWDC 596
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included determining whether the defendant's actions constituted aggravated dangerous driving and if the harm caused was indeed grievous. Additionally, the court had to consider the degree of dangerousness in the defendant's driving and the extent to which the illicit drugs contributed to the dangerousness of the driving. The court also had to establish the appropriate term of imprisonment and the non-parole period considering the severity of the offence.
The court found that the defendant's actions indeed amounted to aggravated dangerous driving. The defendant's driving under the influence of illicit drugs significantly increased the risk of harm, and the collision caused grievous bodily harm to the other driver. The court emphasised the importance of public safety and the need to deter such dangerous driving behaviours. Consequently, the court sentenced the defendant to a term of imprisonment of 2 years and 7 months, with a non-parole period of 1 year and 3 months. The sentence reflects the seriousness of the offence and aims to protect the community from similar occurrences in the future.
Orders
Orders of the court
Term of imprisonment of 2 years 7 months with a non-parole period of 1 year 3 months.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.