R v Regan Zia Yousiph

Link copied
Case Copied 34 min read

District Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Regan Zia Yousiph [2024] NSWDC 541
Hearing dates: 6 September 2024
Date of orders: 20 September 2024
Decision date: 20 September 2024
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Buscombe DCJ
Decision:

The offender is sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 6 years and 8 months, with an aggregate non-parole period of 4 years and 5 months.

Catchwords:

SENTENCING - Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 93GA(1B) – Firing at dwelling-houses or buildings - ‘Drive-by’ shooting

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 93GA(1B)

Crime (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)

Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) s 7(1)

Cases Cited:

White v R [2016] NSWCCA 190

Bugmy v R (2013) 249 CLR 571

Moiler v R [2021] NSWCCA 73

Category:Sentence
Parties: NSW Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Regan Yousiph (Offender)
Representation:

Counsel:
Kay Marinos (Crown)
Thomas Jones (Offender)

Solicitors:
Jennifer Katrib (Crown)
Andrew Sant (Offender)
File Number(s): 2022/229882
Publication restriction: Non-publication order in place in relation to the actual names of the victim, SL, and SL’s father and mother.

JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. The offender, Regan Yousiph, is to be sentenced having pleaded guilty to the following charges: that on 9 April 2022 in Canley Vale, he, in the course of an organised criminal activity, fired a firearm at a dwelling house located at an address which is particularised in the charge on the indictment, with reckless disregard for the safety of another person. That is an offence under s 93GA(1B) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), and has a maximum penalty of 16 years imprisonment, and there is an applicable standard non-parole period of six years. I will refer to that offence in these remarks as the shooting offence.

  2. The second charge is a charge that on 4 August 2022 at Smithfield, the offender possessed a pistol, namely a 9 x 19 millimetre black coloured pistol, not being authorised to do so by a licence. That is an offence under s 7(1) of the Firearms Act 1996 (NSW), and has a maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment, and there is an applicable standard non-parole period of four years.

The Facts

  1. The facts are agreed, and the following is taken from the agreed facts.

  2. Shortly before 11 pm on Saturday, 9 April 2022, a shooting occurred at the dwelling house located at the address particularised on the indictment. This offender, along with the co-offender, Steven Hirmiz, who went to trial and was found guilty by a jury, and who I will sentence later today, were in a joint criminal enterprise, when shortly before 11pm on Saturday, 9 April 2022, they fired two firearms at the dwelling house particularised in the charge, as they drove past it in a hired utility vehicle.

  3. A third offender, I will refer to as a co-offender, Mr Alen Yousif, who I will sentence once I've sentenced Mr Regan Yousiph, was an accessory before the fact to the shooting.

  4. At the time of the offence, this offender resided at 7…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read R v Regan Zia Yousiph and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2024] NSWDC 541
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of R v Regan Zia Yousiph, the offender was convicted of firing a gun at a dwelling-house in a drive-by shooting. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The defendant fired several shots into a house, causing significant damage but fortunately no injuries. The incident arose from a dispute between the offender and the occupants of the house, escalating to the use of firearms.

The legal issues before the court involved the sentencing of the offender under section 93GA(1B) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), which pertains to firing at dwelling-houses or buildings. The court had to consider the gravity of the offence, the circumstances surrounding the shooting, and the need to deter similar conduct. It was also necessary to evaluate the offender’s criminal history and the principles of justice in determining an appropriate sentence.

The court emphasised the seriousness of the offence, noting the potential for serious harm or death had the shots hit anyone inside the house. It considered the offender’s previous convictions and the impact of the shooting on the community. In imposing the sentence, the court balanced the need for punishment and deterrence with the principles of rehabilitation and proportionality. Ultimately, the court sentenced the offender to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 6 years and 8 months, with a non-parole period of 4 years and 5 months.

The final orders reflect the court's determination of the appropriate sentence, taking into account the severity of the crime and the offender's background. The offender is to serve a total of 6 years and 8 months in prison, with the first 4 years and 5 months non-parole period, underscoring the gravity of the offence and the necessity for public safety.

Orders

Orders of the court

The offender is sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 6 years and 8 months, with an aggregate non-parole period of 4 years and 5 months.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.