Local Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Rasavong [2018] NSWLC 5 Hearing dates: 18 April 2018 Decision date: 30 May 2018 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Judge Graeme Henson, Chief Magistrate Decision: The offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 24 months to commence on 30 May 2018 and expiring on 29 May 2020 with a non-parole period of 15 months. The offender is to be released to parole on 29 August 2019.
Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Dishonestly obtain financial advantage by deception - relevant factors – prior history criminal offending – abuse of position of trust – offence involved a degree of planning – committed for financial gain - defendant diagnosed with substance abuse disorder, addictive disorder, and adjustment disorder – impact on former employer – discount for utilitarian value of guilty plea – no other sentence other than imprisonment appropriate – appropriate sentence exceeds jurisdictional limit - effectively removes alternatives to full-time imprisonment from consideration - fact Court determined a sentence beyond the general applicability of alternatives but is constrained by the jurisdictional limit does not re-activate their respective applicability - not appropriate to adjust sentence to bring within parameters of a legislative option if conduct and circumstances would not otherwise justify such an outcome – special circumstances – compensation for loss Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 192E(1)(b), 192E(3)
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 5, 21A(2), 21A(3)(h), 44(2), 68(1)Cases Cited: Kelsall v R [2017] NSWCCA 240
R v Carr [2002] NSWCCA 434
R v Doan (2000) 50 NSWLR 115.
R v Mato; R v Rusu (1999) 109 A Crim R 121
R v Mungomery (2004) 151 A Crim R 376
R v Pantano (1990) 49 A Crim R 328
R v Pont (2000) 121 A Crim R 302
R v Thomson; R v Houlten (2000) 49 NSWLR 383
R v Yildiz (2006) 160 A Crim R 218
R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17Category: Sentence Parties: NSW Police (prosecution)
Billie Joe Rasavong (defendant)Representation: Sgt Phillipson, NSW Police Prosecutors (for the prosecution)
Ms D Chappell, NSW Legal Aid Commission (for the defendant)
File Number(s): 2017/00290648 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment
-
Billie Joe Rasavong is to be sentenced for the offence of Dishonestly Obtaining a Financial Advantage by Deception. The proceedings are brought pursuant to section 192E(1)(b) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW). The maximum penalty upon conviction is imprisonment for 10 years. The offence is listed in Table 1 of Schedule 1 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) as an offence that is to be dealt with summarily before the Local Court unless the Director of Public Prosecutions otherwise elects to proceed on indictment before the District Court. No such election has been made. In these circumstances the Local Court is limited in the exercise of its jurisdiction to a maximum term of imprisonment upon conviction of two years. The jurisdictional limit does not affect the determination of the objective seriousness of the offence. This…
Continue reading R v Rasavong
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Rasavong [2018] NSWLC 5
- Case
- [2018] NSWLC 5
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered several factors in determining the appropriate sentence. These included the defendant's prior criminal history, the abuse of a position of trust, the degree of planning involved in the offence, and the financial gain achieved. The court also took into account the defendant's diagnosis of substance abuse disorder, addictive disorder, and adjustment disorder, as well as the impact of the offence on the former employer. The defendant's early guilty plea was recognised with a discount. However, the court concluded that, given the circumstances, only imprisonment was appropriate. The court found that the appropriate sentence exceeded the jurisdictional limit, effectively excluding alternatives to full-time imprisonment. The court emphasised that the jurisdictional limit constrained their sentencing options, and it was not appropriate to adjust the sentence to fit within legislative parameters if the conduct and circumstances did not justify such an outcome.
The court determined that the defendant should be sentenced to imprisonment for 24 months, to commence on 30 May 2018 and expire on 29 May 2020, with a non-parole period of 15 months. The defendant was to be released to parole on 29 August 2019. The court also ordered the defendant to pay compensation for the loss incurred by the former employer.
Orders
Orders of the court
The offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 24 months to commence on 30 May 2018 and expiring on 29 May 2020 with a non-parole period of 15 months. The offender is to be released to parole on 29 August 2019.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.