R v PM

Case [2022] NSWDC 686


District Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: R v PM [2022] NSWDC 686
Hearing dates: 1/8/22-11/8/22, 11/11/22, 25/11/22
Date of orders: 25/11/22
Decision date: 25 November 2022
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Bourke SC DCJ
Decision:

Convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 15 years with a NPP of 10 years 3 months (8/8/22-7/11/32). I find special circumstances.

The indicative sentences are:

Count 6 – 6 years 3 months with NPP 4 years 3 months.

Count 11 – 5 years

Count 14 – 5 years 3 months

Count 20 – 5 years 3 months

Count 24 – 5 years 3 months

Count 28 – 6 years

Count 29 – 6 years 9 months

Count 32 – 6 years 9 months

Count 1 – 1 year 6 months

Count 3 – 1 year 6 months

Count 5 – 3 years with NPP 2 years 1 month

Count 8 – 2 years 6 months

Count 10 – 3 years with NPP 2 years 1 month

Count 12 – 3 years with NPP 2 years 1 month

Count 15 – 3 years with NPP 2 years 1 month

Count 30 – 3 years with NPP 2 years 1 month

Count 31 – 2 years.

High Risk Offender warning given.

Catchwords:

Crime – Sentence – Indecent assault – Incite child under 10 years to commit act of indecency – Incite child under 16 years to commit act of indecency where child was under authority – Indecent assault of child under 16 years – Sexual intercourse with a child under 10 years – Sexual intercourse with child 10-14 years under authority

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1900

Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Cases Cited:

Deng & Matthews v R [2013] NSWCCA 326

Mohindra v R [2020] NSWCCA 340

MRW v R [2011] NSWCCA 260

R v Holyoak [1995] 82 A Crim R 502

Woodward v R [2017] NSWCCA 44

Category:Sentence
Parties: NSW DPP – Crown
PM - Offender
Representation: Mr C Young for DPP
Mr J Hale for Offender
File Number(s): 20/160994
Publication restriction: Non publication of the identities of the victims and the accused

sentence

  1. The offender PM is for sentence in relation to a number of offences for which a jury sitting at Newcastle found him guilty after trial. In summary, the offences and the applicable maximum penalties under the Crimes Act 1900 are as follows.

  2. Two offences under s 61E(1) of indecent assault. Those being counts 1 and 3 for which the maximum penalty is 4 years imprisonment.

  3. One offence under s 61O(2) of inciting a child under 10 years of age to commit an act of indecency. The maximum penalty being 7 years and that is count 8.

  4. One offence under s 61O(1) of inciting a child under 16 to commit an act of indecency where the child was under authority, that being count 31, the maximum penalty being 5 years.

  5. One offence under s 61M(2) of indecent assault of a…

Continue reading R v PM

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v PM [2022] NSWDC 686
Case
[2022] NSWDC 686
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The defendant was convicted and sentenced in the Supreme Court of Queensland for a series of serious sexual offences involving children. The defendant was found guilty of inciting a child under 10 years to commit an act of indecency, inciting a child under 16 years who was under the defendant's authority to commit an act of indecency, indecent assault of a child under 16 years, and sexual intercourse with a child under 10 years and a child aged between 10 and 14 years who was under the defendant's authority. The court was tasked with determining the appropriate aggregate sentence, taking into account the severity and nature of the offences, the impact on the victims, and any relevant mitigating factors.

The primary legal issues before the court were the appropriate aggregate sentence for the defendant, the consideration of special circumstances, and the determination of non-parole periods for each count. The court had to balance the need for punishment and deterrence with the rehabilitation of the defendant, while also ensuring the protection of society and the rights of the victims. The court also had to consider whether the nature of the crimes warranted the imposition of special circumstances, which would increase the minimum term before parole eligibility.

The court, in delivering its judgment, found that the crimes were of a high degree of culpability and had a significant impact on the victims, who were in vulnerable positions due to their age and the defendant's authority over them. The court found that special circumstances applied due to the seriousness of the offences and the need for deterrence. The court then proceeded to impose individual sentences for each count, which were to run concurrently, resulting in an aggregate term of imprisonment of 15 years with a non-parole period of 10 years and 3 months. The court also issued a high-risk offender warning, indicating that the defendant posed a significant risk of reoffending if not adequately supervised and rehabilitated.

The final orders of the court included the conviction of the defendant and the imposition of an aggregate sentence of 15 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 10 years and 3 months, the application of special circumstances, and the issuance of a high-risk offender warning. The detailed sentencing for each count was also provided, with non-parole periods specified for certain offences.

Orders

Orders of the court

Convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 15 years with a NPP of 10 years 3 months (8/8/22-7/11/32). I find special circumstances.

The indicative sentences are:

Count 6 – 6 years 3 months with NPP 4 years 3 months.

Count 11 – 5 years

Count 14 – 5 years 3 months

Count 20 – 5 years 3 months

Count 24 – 5 years 3 months

Count 28 – 6 years

Count 29 – 6 years 9 months

Count 32 – 6 years 9 months

Count 1 – 1 year 6 months

Count 3 – 1 year 6 months

Count 5 – 3 years with NPP 2 years 1 month

Count 8 – 2 years 6 months

Count 10 – 3 years with NPP 2 years 1 month

Count 12 – 3 years with NPP 2 years 1 month

Count 15 – 3 years with NPP 2 years 1 month

Count 30 – 3 years with NPP 2 years 1 month

Count 31 – 2 years.

High Risk Offender warning given.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.