Legal Research
Cases
R v Paul Charles Ellul No. DCCRM-99-1095

R v Paul Charles Ellul No. DCCRM-99-1095

Case [2001] SADC 6

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: R v Paul Charles Ellul No. DCCRM-99-1095 [2001] SADC 6
Case: [2001] SADC 6
Decision Date: 2 February 2001

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

R v Paul Charles Ellul No. DCCRM-99-1095 [2001] SADC 6

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

R v Lobban [2000] SASC 48
Citation 1 (Para 9)

…Ridgeway v The Queen (1994-1995) 184 CLR 19, The Queen v Ridgeway (1998) 72 SASR 73, The Queen v Swaffield and Pavic v The Queen (1998) 192 CLR 159, The Queen v Lobban (2000) SASC 48). Here there is no suggestion that the police were acting other than in a bona fide fashion and that any error was at a senior level complete…
R v Ridgeway [1998] SASC 6963
Citation 2 (Para 9)

…I am also cognisant of the authorities dealing with the exercise of the discretion: (for example, Ridgeway v The Queen (1994-1995) 184 CLR 19, The Queen v Ridgeway (1998) 72 SASR 73, The Queen v Swaffield and Pavic v The Queen (1998) 192 CLR 159, The Queen v Lobban (2000) SASC 48). Here there is no suggestion that the police…
R v Swaffield [1998] HCA 1
Citation 3 (Para 9)

…etion: (for example, Ridgeway v The Queen (1994-1995) 184 CLR 19, The Queen v Ridgeway (1998) 72 SASR 73, The Queen v Swaffield and Pavic v The Queen (1998) 192 CLR 159, The Queen v Lobban (2000) SASC 48). Here there is no suggestion that the police were acting other than in a bona fide fashion and that any error was…
Ridgeway v the Queen [1995] HCA 66
Citation 4 (Para 9)

…I am also cognisant of the authorities dealing with the exercise of the discretion: (for example, Ridgeway v The Queen (1994-1995) 184 CLR 19, The Queen v Ridgeway (1998) 72 SASR 73, The Queen v Swaffield and Pavic v The Queen (1998) 192 CLR 159, The Queen v Lobban (2000) SASC 48). Here there is no suggestion…
Jacobsen v Rogers [1995] HCA 6
Citation 5 (Para 6)

…search warrant, particularly if claims of legal professional privilege or public interest immunity arise: see Jacobsen and Anor v Rogers (1994-1995) 182 CLR 572 at 590. However, that is completely different from the circumstances that pertain to the decision as to which of two types of available warrant is us…
George v Rockett [1990] HCA 26
Citation 6 (Para 8)

…e need for strict compliance with statutory requirements when it comes to the issuing of a search warrant (in particular George v Rockett and Another (1990) 170 CLR 104).…

AI Chat coming soon