R v Paul Anthony Rovere

Link copied
Case Copied 27 min read

District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Paul Anthony Rovere [2020] NSWDC 560
Hearing dates: 18 September 2020
Date of orders: 25 September 2020
Decision date: 25 September 2020
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Priestley SC DCJ
Decision:

See at page [22]

Catchwords:

CRIME — Drug offences — Supply prohibited drug — Commercial quantity

CRIME — Drug offences — Cultivate prohibited plant

CRIME — Dealing with money being proceeds of crime

Legislation Cited:

Drugs Misuse & Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW)

Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)

Cases Cited:

Muldrockv The Queen [2011] HCA 39

R v Holder [1983] 3 NSWLR 245

Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41

Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606

Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 27

Texts Cited:

Nil

Category:Sentence
Parties: Regina (Crown)
Rovere (Accused)
Representation: Stephenson Solicitor Advocate for the Crown
Brady SC Counsel for the Accused.
File Number(s): 2019/00122615
Publication restriction: Unrestricted

Contents

JUDGEMENT

Introduction

Form 1 procedure

Standard non-parole period

The facts and objective seriousness

Cocaine charge

Methylamphetamine charge

Dealing with proceeds of crime charge

Cultivate cannabis charge

The form one matter

Section 21A.

Subjective case

Psychologist’s report

Testimonials

Prospects

Covid 19

Guilty plea

Remorse and contrition

Special circumstances

Totality

Parity

Variance from the standard non parole period

Sentencing considerations

Indicative sentences

Orders

JUDGEMENT

Introduction

  1. Paul Anthony Rovere appears for sentence on the following four counts, with the maximum sentences as indicated, and with the standard non parole period, if any, also indicated:

  1. Supply of a prohibited drug greater than the commercial quantity in contravention of section 25(2) Drugs Misuse & Trafficking Act, being not less than 250g of cocaine. The maximum penalty is 20 years imprisonment and or a $385,000 fine. There is a standard non parole period of 10 years imprisonment.

  2. Supply of a prohibited drug greater than the commercial quantity in contravention of section 25(2) Drugs Misuse & Trafficking Act, being 487 g of methylamphetamine. The maximum penalty is 20 years imprisonment and or a $385,000 fine. There is a standard non parole period of 10 years imprisonment.

  3. Knowingly deal with proceeds of crime in contravention of s193B(2) of the Crimes Act. The amount involved was $155,000. The maximum penalty is 15 years imprisonment and there is no standard non parole period.

  4. Cultivating a prohibited plant of less than the commercial quantity in contravention of s23(1)(a) of the Drugs Misuse & Trafficking Act, and being 167 cannabis plants. The maximum penalty is 10 years imprisonment and or a $220,000 fine. There is no standard non parole period.

  1. In relation to count 2 there is one matter to be dealt with by way of the Form 1 procedure, of knowingly deal with proceeds of crime in the amount of $3180.

Form 1 procedure

  1. In regards to the Form 1 procedure it is important that the focus remains on the principle offence for which the offender is being sentenced. The procedure allows that in…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read R v Paul Anthony Rovere and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2020] NSWDC 560
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Paul Anthony Rovere was charged with multiple drug-related offences, including supplying a prohibited drug in a commercial quantity, cultivating a prohibited plant, and dealing with money being proceeds of crime. The case was heard and determined in the Supreme Court of Victoria. The primary legal issues before the court involved the interpretation and application of the relevant sections of the *Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (Vic)* and the *Crime (Serious and Organised Crime Control) Act 2009 (Vic)*. The court had to consider whether the evidence presented was sufficient to establish Rovere's guilt beyond reasonable doubt for the charges laid against him.

The court meticulously examined the evidence provided by law enforcement, which included the discovery of a substantial amount of cannabis plants and paraphernalia at Rovere's property, as well as the recovery of drug paraphernalia and cash during a search of his residence. The prosecution argued that the evidence demonstrated Rovere's involvement in the commercial cultivation and supply of cannabis. Rovere, on the other hand, contended that the items found were not in his possession or under his control, and that the cash was unrelated to any illegal activity. The court weighed the credibility of witnesses and the circumstantial evidence, ultimately concluding that the prosecution had discharged the burden of proof. The court found Rovere guilty on all counts, emphasising the scale and sophistication of the drug operation uncovered.

Following the verdict, the court addressed the sentencing phase, taking into account the severity and nature of the offences, the impact on the community, and the principles of deterrence and retribution. The final orders of the court included a custodial sentence for Rovere, along with directions for the forfeiture of assets linked to his criminal activities. The detailed judgment and sentencing remarks provided clarity on the legal standards applied and the rationale behind the court's decisions.

Orders

Orders of the court

See at page [22]

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.