District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Paul Anthony Rovere [2020] NSWDC 560 Hearing dates: 18 September 2020 Date of orders: 25 September 2020 Decision date: 25 September 2020 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Priestley SC DCJ Decision: See at page [22]
Catchwords: CRIME — Drug offences — Supply prohibited drug — Commercial quantity
CRIME — Drug offences — Cultivate prohibited plant
CRIME — Dealing with money being proceeds of crime
Legislation Cited: Drugs Misuse & Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW)
Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Muldrockv The Queen [2011] HCA 39
R v Holder [1983] 3 NSWLR 245
Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41
Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606
Texts Cited: Nil
Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown)
Rovere (Accused)Representation: Stephenson Solicitor Advocate for the Crown
Brady SC Counsel for the Accused.
File Number(s): 2019/00122615 Publication restriction: Unrestricted
Contents
JUDGEMENT
Introduction
Form 1 procedure
Standard non-parole period
The facts and objective seriousness
Cocaine charge
Methylamphetamine charge
Dealing with proceeds of crime charge
Cultivate cannabis charge
The form one matter
Section 21A.
Subjective case
Psychologist’s report
Testimonials
Prospects
Covid 19
Guilty plea
Remorse and contrition
Special circumstances
Totality
Parity
Variance from the standard non parole period
Sentencing considerations
Indicative sentences
Orders
JUDGEMENT
Introduction
-
Paul Anthony Rovere appears for sentence on the following four counts, with the maximum sentences as indicated, and with the standard non parole period, if any, also indicated:
Supply of a prohibited drug greater than the commercial quantity in contravention of section 25(2) Drugs Misuse & Trafficking Act, being not less than 250g of cocaine. The maximum penalty is 20 years imprisonment and or a $385,000 fine. There is a standard non parole period of 10 years imprisonment.
Supply of a prohibited drug greater than the commercial quantity in contravention of section 25(2) Drugs Misuse & Trafficking Act, being 487 g of methylamphetamine. The maximum penalty is 20 years imprisonment and or a $385,000 fine. There is a standard non parole period of 10 years imprisonment.
Knowingly deal with proceeds of crime in contravention of s193B(2) of the Crimes Act. The amount involved was $155,000. The maximum penalty is 15 years imprisonment and there is no standard non parole period.
Cultivating a prohibited plant of less than the commercial quantity in contravention of s23(1)(a) of the Drugs Misuse & Trafficking Act, and being 167 cannabis plants. The maximum penalty is 10 years imprisonment and or a $220,000 fine. There is no standard non parole period.
-
In relation to count 2 there is one matter to be dealt with by way of the Form 1 procedure, of knowingly deal with proceeds of crime in the amount of $3180.
Form 1 procedure
-
In regards to the Form 1 procedure it is important that the focus remains on the principle offence for which the offender is being sentenced. The procedure allows that in…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read R v Paul Anthony Rovere and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2020] NSWDC 560
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court meticulously examined the evidence provided by law enforcement, which included the discovery of a substantial amount of cannabis plants and paraphernalia at Rovere's property, as well as the recovery of drug paraphernalia and cash during a search of his residence. The prosecution argued that the evidence demonstrated Rovere's involvement in the commercial cultivation and supply of cannabis. Rovere, on the other hand, contended that the items found were not in his possession or under his control, and that the cash was unrelated to any illegal activity. The court weighed the credibility of witnesses and the circumstantial evidence, ultimately concluding that the prosecution had discharged the burden of proof. The court found Rovere guilty on all counts, emphasising the scale and sophistication of the drug operation uncovered.
Following the verdict, the court addressed the sentencing phase, taking into account the severity and nature of the offences, the impact on the community, and the principles of deterrence and retribution. The final orders of the court included a custodial sentence for Rovere, along with directions for the forfeiture of assets linked to his criminal activities. The detailed judgment and sentencing remarks provided clarity on the legal standards applied and the rationale behind the court's decisions.
Orders
Orders of the court
See at page [22]
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.