R v Pan

Case [2019] NSWDC 407


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Pan [2019] NSWDC 407
Hearing dates: 2 August 2019
Date of orders: 02 August 2019
Decision date: 02 August 2019
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Weinstein SC DCJ
Decision:

I convict you of possessing counterfeit money on or about 26 October 2016, contrary to section 9(1)(a) of the Crimes (Currency) Act 1981 (Cth).

 

You are ordered to comply with a conditional release order pursuant to section 20 of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth).

 

The term of the order is two years.

 

You are released on your own recognizance in the amount of $1.

 

The conditions of the order are:

 

(1) You will be of good behaviour; and

 

(2) You must appear before the court if called upon to do so at any time during the term of the order.

 If you fail to comply with these orders, further penalties may apply.
Catchwords: CRIMINAL – SENTENCING – possess counterfeit money – limited remorse – conviction
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), Part 1B, ss 16A, 17A, 19B, 20
Crimes (Currency) Act 1981 (Cth), s 9(1)(a)
Cases Cited: Commissioner of Taxation v Baffsky [2001] NSWCCA 332 at [10]
R v Gittani [2002] NSWCCA 139
Category:Sentence
Parties: Regina (Crown)
Mr Glissan QC (Pan)
Representation:

Counsel:
Mr Glissan QC (Pan)

  Solicitors:
Ms Karavias (Crown)
Mr Mann (Pan)
File Number(s): 2016/320282

Judgment

Offences

  1. The offender Zhang Pan, born in 1983, comes before the court to be sentenced after pleading guilty to one count of possessing counterfeit money (not excepted counterfeit coin) on about 26 October 2016, contrary to section 9(1)(a) of the Crimes (Currency) Act 1981 (Cth). The maximum penalty for this offence is 600 penalty units or 10 years imprisonment.

  2. Before me, I have a bundle tendered by the Crown as Exhibit 1 which contains:

  1. The indictment;

  2. The Statement of Facts;

  3. The criminal record of Mr Pan;

  4. A Sentencing Assessment Report (SAR);

  5. The Crown submissions; and

  6. A schedule of a comparable case

STATEMENT OF FACTS

  1. A trial was conducted before me from 7 May 2019 to 24 May 2019 in relation to other matters. The accused was acquitted of those charges. He pleaded guilty to the charge for which he is to be sentenced on the first day of that trial.

Background

  1. The statement of statement of facts state that Zhang Pan (the offender) is a Chinese National who arrived in Australia in 2006. The offender entered Australia with a Student Visa. In 2012 he was granted a Temporary Skilled Work visa. In 2013 the offender was granted a Residence Business Skills visa which he still holds.

  2. In 2009 the offender registered Winmax Pty Ltd as Director and remained so until the company was deregistered in 2017. In 2016, the offender did not receive any income from Winmax.

  3. The offender was registered for income tax in 2006 and has lodged no tax returns since that time.

  4. At all relevant times, the offender lived at unit 702, at Rider Boulevard in Rhodes, NSW (the premises). The…

Continue reading R v Pan

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Pan [2019] NSWDC 407
Case
[2019] NSWDC 407
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of R v Pan involved the defendant, Pan, who was convicted of possessing counterfeit money. The dispute was heard in the relevant court, and the primary legal issue was to determine the appropriate sentence for Pan given the nature of his crime and the circumstances surrounding it. The court needed to consider the severity of the offence, Pan's level of remorse, and any other relevant mitigating or aggravating factors. Additionally, the court had to decide on the conditions of Pan's conditional release order under the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth).

In delivering the judgment, the court first outlined the facts of the case, noting that Pan was found in possession of counterfeit money on or about 26 October 2016. The court recognised that possession of counterfeit currency is a serious offence, as it undermines the integrity of the nation's currency and can have broader economic implications. However, the court also took into account Pan's limited remorse and other mitigating factors presented during the sentencing hearing. Despite these factors, the court emphasised the need for a sentence that reflects the seriousness of the offence while also considering the individual circumstances of the defendant.

The court ultimately decided to convict Pan and impose a conditional release order under the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth). The term of the order was set at two years, with Pan being released on his own recognizance in the amount of $1. The conditions of the order included maintaining good behaviour and appearing before the court if required. The court's decision was based on a balanced consideration of the offence's gravity, Pan's limited remorse, and the need for a sentence that serves as a deterrent while also providing an opportunity for rehabilitation.

Orders

Orders of the court

I convict you of possessing counterfeit money on or about 26 October 2016, contrary to section 9(1)(a) of the Crimes (Currency) Act 1981 (Cth).

You are ordered to comply with a conditional release order pursuant to section 20 of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth).

The term of the order is two years.

You are released on your own recognizance in the amount of $1.

The conditions of the order are:

(1) You will be of good behaviour; and

(2) You must appear before the court if called upon to do so at any time during the term of the order.

If you fail to comply with these orders, further penalties may apply.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.