R v Ninos Georges

Link copied
Case Copied 11 min read

District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Ninos GEORGES [2011] NSWDC 61
Hearing dates:8 April 2011
Decision date: 08 April 2011
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Haesler DCJ SC
Decision:

Count 1 - Proceeds of crime offence and Form 1. Section 12 suspended sentence 12 months.

Catchwords: CRIMINAL - Proceeds of crime - Possess prohibited drug - Possess prescribed restricted substance - Operation Schoale
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Cases Cited: R v Thomson and Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383
R v Peisley [2010] NSWDC 240
R v Saliba [2010] NSWDC 277
R v Tanya Youkhana [2011] NSWDC 63
Category:Sentence
Parties: Regina
Ninos Georges
Representation: Mr F Santisi (Offender)
Ms F Gray (Director of Public Prosecutions)
File Number(s):2008/256487

SENTENCE

  1. On 28 February 2007 police executed a search warrant at the flat of Ninos Georges, the offender, in Bondi Junction. There they located $255,250 in Australian currency in a number of areas in the premises set out in the photographs and noted in the Agreed Facts that are before the Court.

  1. Also found was a money-counting machine, a number of mobile phones, two boxes of the human growth hormone known as Scitropin, two boxes of another human growth hormone known as Saizen and a small quantity of cannabis.

  1. Subsequent investigations led to the Director of Public Prosecutions accepting that $55,000 of the cash found should not be the subject of the present charge.

  1. This matter has a long history. Since the date of arrest the offender has been on bail and there have been lengthy criminal proceedings involving a large number of people associated with a Crime Commission and New South Wales Police Force operation which was given the code name Operation Schoale. As a result of this operation a number of people have been charged in relation to the importation of a commercial quantity of cocaine, the supply of large amounts of cocaine and their involvement with others in the holding and disposal of significant sums of cash.

  1. The present offender's association with the matters that gave rise to Operation Schoale is that he is an associate of a man by the name of Luke Sparos and his wife Christine Saliba. The offender resided in the same apartment complex as those people and, for a period, his rent was paid by Ms Saliba.

  1. The investigations and subsequent court appearances of the people associated with Operation Schoale took some considerable time. It is accepted by the solicitor for the Director of Public Prosecutions that this particular offender was not a major player and, as a consequence, his matter did not get the same priority as others. It is also accepted that while initially there were problems in coming to agreement between those then representing the offender and those then appearing for the Director, subsequently a spirit of co-operation developed that led to a fresh indictment being presented in January of this year. A plea of guilty was accepted. That plea was…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read R v Ninos Georges and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2011] NSWDC 61
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter between the Commonwealth and Ninos Georges was heard in the Supreme Court of South Australia. The defendant was charged with possessing a prohibited drug, possessing a prescribed restricted substance, and a proceeds of crime offence, all of which arose from Operation Schoale. The case involved a detailed examination of the defendant's involvement in these activities and the legal consequences that followed. The court had to determine whether the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, and if so, the appropriate sentence for the defendant.

The central legal issues revolved around whether the evidence presented by the prosecution was sufficient to prove the charges against the defendant. The court had to consider the credibility of the witnesses, the chain of custody of the seized substances, and the relevance of the defendant's conduct in relation to the proceeds of crime offence. Additionally, the court needed to assess the impact of the defendant's plea of guilty on the sentencing process.

In reaching its decision, the court found that the evidence presented was compelling and that the defendant's involvement in the activities was clear. The court noted the defendant's guilty plea and the significant assistance he provided to the authorities, which were taken into account during sentencing. The court imposed a sentence of 12 months, suspended for one year, and ordered the defendant to complete Form 1, which involves community service and other rehabilitative activities. The court's decision was based on a comprehensive assessment of the defendant's criminal conduct and the principles of justice and deterrence.

Orders

Orders of the court

Count 1 - Proceeds of crime offence and Form 1. Section 12 suspended sentence 12 months.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.