District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Nasr [2023] NSWDC 435 Hearing dates: 12 October 2023 Date of orders: 12 October 2023 Decision date: 12 October 2023 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Scotting DCJ Decision: 1 Milad Nasr is convicted.
2 I impose a term of imprisonment of 1 year and 6 months.
3 Pursuant to s 7(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, the sentence imposed is to be served by way of an ICO. The sentence will commence today (12 October 2023) and expire on 11 April 2025.
4 The offender must report to the Bankstown Community Corrections Office on or before 4pm on 19 October 2023.
5 The standard conditions of the order apply:
(a) the offender must not commit any offence; and
(b) the offender must submit to supervision by a Community Corrections Officer.
6 The following additional conditions apply:
(a) the offender must abstain from consuming and/or taking all restricted or prohibited drugs, except those prescribed by a medical practitioner; and
(b) the offender must participate in and receive mental health treatment as reasonably directed by Community Corrections.
Catchwords: CRIME — Violent offences — Reckless wounding
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900
Cases Cited: R v Dickinson [2004] NSWCCA 457
R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270
R v Watt (unreported 2 April 1997, NSWCCA)
Category: Sentence Parties: Rex (Crown)
Milad Nasr (Offender)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
W Barber (Offender)
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Richard Cummins (Offender)
File Number(s): 2022/60066 Publication restriction: None
JUDGMENT
Introduction
-
Milad Nasr (the offender) appears for sentence after pleading guilty in the Local Court to an offence of reckless wounding (DV), contrary to s 35(4), Crimes Act 1900. The maximum penalty for the offence is seven years imprisonment and the standard non-parole period is three years.
Approach to Sentencing
-
To the extent that I make findings of fact adverse to the offender, I am satisfied of that fact beyond reasonable doubt. To the extent that I make findings of fact favourable to the offender, I am satisfied of that fact on the balance of probabilities: R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270 at [27] (Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, Hayne and Callinan JJ).
-
I have taken into account the purposes of sentencing set out in s 3A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 and had regard to the matters set out in s 21A of the Act.
-
The offender entered a plea of guilty in the Local Court and is entitled to a 25% discount on sentence: s 25D(2)(a) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.
Facts
-
The parties presented an Agreed Statement of Facts. I have taken the entirety of the document into account in coming to an appropriate sentence. What follows is a brief summary of the facts relevant to the offender to permit an understanding of the sentence imposed.
-
The victim in this matter is Dyllan Peacock, the offender’s brother-in-law.…
Continue reading R v Nasr
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Nasr [2023] NSWDC 435
- Case
- [2023] NSWDC 435
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that Nasr's actions were reckless, but not malicious. This conclusion was based on the evidence presented, which indicated that the altercation was not premeditated and Nasr did not intend to cause serious harm. The court considered several factors, including the circumstances of the incident, Nasr's criminal history, and his prospects for rehabilitation. Given these factors, the court determined that a term of imprisonment was necessary, but also recognised the importance of rehabilitation and deterrence. The sentence imposed was a term of imprisonment of 1 year and 6 months, to be served by way of an intensive corrections order. This decision was intended to balance the need for punishment with the opportunity for Nasr to address underlying issues that contributed to his criminal behaviour.
The court imposed a number of conditions on the intensive corrections order to ensure Nasr's compliance and to protect the community. These conditions included abstaining from the use of restricted or prohibited drugs, except as prescribed by a medical practitioner, and participating in mental health treatment as directed by Community Corrections. The offender was also required to report to the Bankstown Community Corrections Office within a specified timeframe and to submit to supervision by a Community Corrections Officer. The sentence was backdated to the date of Nasr's arrest, 12 October 2023, and is set to expire on 11 April 2025.
Orders
Orders of the court
1 Milad Nasr is convicted.
2 I impose a term of imprisonment of 1 year and 6 months.
3 Pursuant to s 7(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, the sentence imposed is to be served by way of an ICO. The sentence will commence today (12 October 2023) and expire on 11 April 2025.
4 The offender must report to the Bankstown Community Corrections Office on or before 4pm on 19 October 2023.
5 The standard conditions of the order apply:
(a) the offender must not commit any offence; and
(b) the offender must submit to supervision by a Community Corrections Officer.
6 The following additional conditions apply:
(a) the offender must abstain from consuming and/or taking all restricted or prohibited drugs, except those prescribed by a medical practitioner; and
(b) the offender must participate in and receive mental health treatment as reasonably directed by Community Corrections.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.