R v Nasr

Case [2023] NSWDC 435


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Nasr [2023] NSWDC 435
Hearing dates: 12 October 2023
Date of orders: 12 October 2023
Decision date: 12 October 2023
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Scotting DCJ
Decision:

1   Milad Nasr is convicted.

2   I impose a term of imprisonment of 1 year and 6 months.

3 Pursuant to s 7(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, the sentence imposed is to be served by way of an ICO. The sentence will commence today (12 October 2023) and expire on 11 April 2025.

4   The offender must report to the Bankstown Community Corrections Office on or before 4pm on 19 October 2023.

5   The standard conditions of the order apply:

(a)   the offender must not commit any offence; and

(b)   the offender must submit to supervision by a Community Corrections Officer.

6   The following additional conditions apply:

(a)   the offender must abstain from consuming and/or taking all restricted or prohibited drugs, except those prescribed by a medical practitioner; and

(b)   the offender must participate in and receive mental health treatment as reasonably directed by Community Corrections.

Catchwords:

CRIME — Violent offences — Reckless wounding

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1900

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Cases Cited:

Bugmy v R (2013) 249 CLR 571

R v Dickinson [2004] NSWCCA 457

R v Hampton [1999] NSWCCA 341

R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270

R v Watt (unreported 2 April 1997, NSWCCA)

Category:Sentence
Parties: Rex (Crown)
Milad Nasr (Offender)
Representation:

Counsel:
W Barber (Offender)

Solicitors:
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Richard Cummins (Offender)
File Number(s): 2022/60066
Publication restriction: None

JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. Milad Nasr (the offender) appears for sentence after pleading guilty in the Local Court to an offence of reckless wounding (DV), contrary to s 35(4), Crimes Act 1900. The maximum penalty for the offence is seven years imprisonment and the standard non-parole period is three years.

Approach to Sentencing

  1. To the extent that I make findings of fact adverse to the offender, I am satisfied of that fact beyond reasonable doubt. To the extent that I make findings of fact favourable to the offender, I am satisfied of that fact on the balance of probabilities: R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270 at [27] (Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, Hayne and Callinan JJ).

  2. I have taken into account the purposes of sentencing set out in s 3A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 and had regard to the matters set out in s 21A of the Act.

  3. The offender entered a plea of guilty in the Local Court and is entitled to a 25% discount on sentence: s 25D(2)(a) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.

Facts

  1. The parties presented an Agreed Statement of Facts. I have taken the entirety of the document into account in coming to an appropriate sentence. What follows is a brief summary of the facts relevant to the offender to permit an understanding of the sentence imposed.

  2. The victim in this matter is Dyllan Peacock, the offender’s brother-in-law.…

Continue reading R v Nasr

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Nasr [2023] NSWDC 435
Case
[2023] NSWDC 435
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Nasr was charged with recklessly wounding another person in what was described as an alcohol-fuelled altercation. The matter was heard in the District Court of New South Wales, presided over by His Honour Judge Smith. The primary issue for determination was the degree of culpability Nasr exhibited in the incident and the appropriate sentence to reflect this culpability. The court also had to consider the sentencing principles outlined in the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.

The court found that Nasr's actions were reckless, but not malicious. This conclusion was based on the evidence presented, which indicated that the altercation was not premeditated and Nasr did not intend to cause serious harm. The court considered several factors, including the circumstances of the incident, Nasr's criminal history, and his prospects for rehabilitation. Given these factors, the court determined that a term of imprisonment was necessary, but also recognised the importance of rehabilitation and deterrence. The sentence imposed was a term of imprisonment of 1 year and 6 months, to be served by way of an intensive corrections order. This decision was intended to balance the need for punishment with the opportunity for Nasr to address underlying issues that contributed to his criminal behaviour.

The court imposed a number of conditions on the intensive corrections order to ensure Nasr's compliance and to protect the community. These conditions included abstaining from the use of restricted or prohibited drugs, except as prescribed by a medical practitioner, and participating in mental health treatment as directed by Community Corrections. The offender was also required to report to the Bankstown Community Corrections Office within a specified timeframe and to submit to supervision by a Community Corrections Officer. The sentence was backdated to the date of Nasr's arrest, 12 October 2023, and is set to expire on 11 April 2025.

Orders

Orders of the court

1 Milad Nasr is convicted.

2 I impose a term of imprisonment of 1 year and 6 months.

3 Pursuant to s 7(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, the sentence imposed is to be served by way of an ICO. The sentence will commence today (12 October 2023) and expire on 11 April 2025.

4 The offender must report to the Bankstown Community Corrections Office on or before 4pm on 19 October 2023.

5 The standard conditions of the order apply:

(a) the offender must not commit any offence; and

(b) the offender must submit to supervision by a Community Corrections Officer.

6 The following additional conditions apply:

(a) the offender must abstain from consuming and/or taking all restricted or prohibited drugs, except those prescribed by a medical practitioner; and

(b) the offender must participate in and receive mental health treatment as reasonably directed by Community Corrections.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.