R v Nash

Case [2012] VSC 507


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA Not Restricted

AT MELBOURNE

CRIMINAL DIVISION

No S CR 7 of 2012

THE QUEEN
v
BEN ANTHONY NASH

---

JUDGE:

ROBSON J

WHERE HELD:

Melbourne

DATE OF HEARING:

20 September 2012

DATE OF SENTENCE:

1 November  2012

CASE MAY BE CITED AS:

R v Nash

MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION:

[2012] VSC 507

---

CRIMINAL LAW – Sentencing – Intentionally causing serious injury – Kicking and punching a mature-aged woman – Plea of guilty – Offender suffering from impaired mental functioning – Major depressive disorder – R v Verdins enlivened – Causal connection with offending conduct – Disinhibiting effect of alcohol and drugs.

---

APPEARANCES:

Counsel Solicitors
For the Crown Mr D A Trapnell SC Department of Public Prosecutions
For the Accused Ms M Walker (solicitor) Melinda Walker – Criminal Solicitor

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction............................................................................................................................... 1
My role in sentencing you......................................................................................................... 1
Maximum penalty prescribed for the offences........................................................................... 3
Circumstances of the offences.................................................................................................... 3
Injuries....................................................................................................................................... 6
Arrest and Investigation............................................................................................................ 7
The impact of the offence on any victim of the offence and her personal circumstances........... 7
The Plea on your behalf............................................................................................................ 10
Personal circumstances............................................................................................................ 10
Evidence of Dr Cidoni.............................................................................................................. 12
Dr Ross’s report....................................................................................................................... 15
Plea of guilty............................................................................................................................ 15
Remorse.................................................................................................................................... 17
Your previous character........................................................................................................... 17
Prospects of rehabilitation........................................................................................................ 19
Circumstances of the offence.................................................................................................... 19
Your mental state..................................................................................................................... 20
Moral culpability..................................................................................................................... 23
General deterrence................................................................................................................... 23
Specific deterrence.................................................................................................................... 24
The sentence will weigh more heavily upon you..................................................................... 24
Is there a serious risk of imprisonment having a significant adverse effect on your mental health? 25
The influence of alcohol and drugs.......................................................................................... 25
Current sentencing practice.................................................................................................... 26
Nature and gravity of the offences........................................................................................... 26
Conclusion............................................................................................................................... 27

HIS HONOUR:

Introduction

  1. Ben Anthony Nash, you have pleaded guilty to these offences:

(a)Count 1: intentionally causing serious injury contrary to s 16 of the Crimes Act 1958;

(b)Count 2: driving a motor vehicle whilst disqualified contrary to s 30(1) of the Road Safety Act 1986; and

(c)Count 3: using a drug of dependence namely heroin contrary to s 75 of the Drugs Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981.

My role in sentencing you

  1. It is my duty to sentence you for these offences.  In doing so I must form a conclusion as to the relevant facts relating to the counts to which you have pleaded guilty.[1]  Save for one matter (which I will address later), there has been no objection by you to the Crown summary of the relevant facts relating to the counts to which you have pleaded guilty, and, accordingly, I will adopt the Crown’s description of the relevant facts.  I must also take into account all relevant matters relating to you.

    [1]Cheung v The Queen (2001) 209 CLR 1, [14] (Gleeson CJ and Gummow and Hayne JJ).

  1. I shall proceed to do so, mindful of the relevant principles, namely –

(a)that I must be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt of any fact which might be relied on in aggravation of the offence for which you have been convicted; and

Continue reading R v Nash

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Nash [2012] VSC 507
Case
[2012] VSC 507
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The respondent, Nash, was charged with intentionally causing serious injury to a woman by kicking and punching her. Nash entered a guilty plea and the matter proceeded to sentencing. The court was tasked with determining the appropriate sentence, taking into account the respondent's mental health issues, including major depressive disorder, and the impact of alcohol and drugs on his conduct. The Crown submitted that the respondent's mental health issues were not a mitigating factor in sentencing, while the respondent argued that his mental health issues should be considered as a mitigating factor.

The court considered the principles set out in R v Verdins and held that the respondent's major depressive disorder was a relevant mitigating factor in sentencing. The court found that the disinhibiting effect of alcohol and drugs had a causal connection with the offending conduct, but this did not exclude the respondent's mental health issues as a mitigating factor. The court also considered the severity of the offending conduct, the respondent's criminal history, and his prospects for rehabilitation in determining the appropriate sentence.

The court sentenced the respondent to a term of imprisonment with a non-parole period of six years. The court found that the sentence should reflect the seriousness of the offending conduct, while also taking into account the mitigating factors present in the case. The court held that the sentence should also provide an opportunity for the respondent to address his mental health issues and reduce the likelihood of reoffending.

The court ordered that the respondent be detained in custody until the sentence was carried out. The court also made an order for the respondent to undergo a mental health assessment and treatment while in custody.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.