SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
Case Title: | R v MZ |
Citation: | [2019] ACTSC 341 |
Hearing Date: | 3 December 2019 |
DecisionDate: | 6 December 2019 |
Before: | Mossop J |
Decision: | See [43] |
Catchwords: | CRIMINAL LAW – JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Judgment and punishment – sentencing – sexual intercourse without consent – administer a declared substance without authority – offending in the lower range of objective seriousness for the offences – no criminal history – positive character references – no remorse – offender suffering from depression and anxiety – full-time imprisonment more onerous upon the offender – partially suspended sentence imposed |
Legislation Cited: | Crimes Act 1900 (ACT), s 54(1) Crimes (Sentence Administration) Act 2005 (ACT) Medicines, Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Act 2008 (ACT), s 37(1) |
Cases Cited: | DPP v Jurj & Miftode [2016] VSCA 57 Kirby v MZ [2019] ACTSC 327 |
Parties: | The Queen (Crown) MZ (Offender) |
Representation: | Counsel S Jerome (Crown) M Jones (Offender) |
| Solicitors ACT Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Kamy Saeedi Law (Offender) | |
File Numbers: | SCC 318 & 319 of 2018 |
MOSSOP J:
Introduction
The offender, who, in order not to identify the victim of the offending I will refer to as MZ, was found guilty by a jury of one count of sexual intercourse without consent contrary to s 54(1) of the Crimes Act 1900 (ACT). That offence is punishable by imprisonment for 12 years.
I also found the offender guilty of a related charge, being one count of administering a declared substance to someone else without authorisation to administer the substance, contrary to s 37(1) of the Medicines, Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Act 2008 (ACT): see Kirby v MZ [2019] ACTSC 327. The maximum penalty for that offence is 100 penalty units, imprisonment for one year or both.
Facts
I described the facts of the offence in Kirby v MZ. They are as follows:
10. The complainant and the accused were married. They were separated but living under one roof. On the evening of 16 August 2018, the complainant was sharing a bed with her three-year-old daughter. After the complainant had gone to bed, on a number of occasions during the evening the accused went into the bedroom where the complainant was sleeping to discuss issues relating to their financial affairs and their divorce. After he had come in a number of times the complainant commenced an audio recording on her mobile phone sometime after midnight.
11. About an hour into the recording, the accused engaged in sexual intercourse with the complainant. This was a fact which he admitted. The…
Continue reading R v MZ
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v MZ [2019] ACTSC 341
- Case
- [2019] ACTSC 341
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues for the court were the appropriate range of penalties for the offences and the factors that should be taken into account when determining the specific sentence. The court had to consider the objective seriousness of the offences, the defendant's criminal history, character, and any mitigating factors. The court also needed to decide whether a full-time imprisonment or a partially suspended sentence would be more appropriate, given the defendant's personal circumstances.
The court found that the offences were in the lower range of objective seriousness. The defendant had no prior criminal history and had received positive character references. However, the court noted that the defendant had not shown remorse for their actions. Additionally, the defendant was suffering from depression and anxiety, which the court took into account. Considering these factors, the court determined that a full-time imprisonment would be more onerous on the defendant. Therefore, the court imposed a partially suspended sentence to balance the need for punishment and rehabilitation.
The court ordered that the defendant be sentenced to a partially suspended sentence, with specific conditions attached. The defendant was also ordered to participate in a rehabilitation program and to comply with other specified requirements.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [43]
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.