R v Moh'd

Case [2024] NSWDC 522


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Moh’d [2024] NSWDC 522
Hearing dates: 9/7/24-6/8/24, 27/9/24
Date of orders: 27 September 2024
Decision date: 27 September 2024
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Bourke SC DCJ
Decision:

Convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 5 years 2 months with a NPP of 3 years 6 months (5/8/24-4/2/28). I find special circumstances.

Indicative sentences:

Count 1 – 12 months with NPP 8 months

Count 2 – 18 months with NPP 12 months

Count 5 – 4 years 2 months with NPP 33 months

Count 6 – 12 months with NPP 8 months.

Catchwords:

Crime – Sentence -

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1900

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Cases Cited:

Commonwealth DPP v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1

Mohindra v R [2020] NSWCCA 340

MRW v R [2011] NSWCCA 260

Category:Sentence
Parties: NSW DPP – Crown
Ali Moh’d - Offender
Representation: Ms S Beaumont for Crown
Ms L Barnes for Offender
File Number(s): 22/93559
Publication restriction: Statutory non-publication in relation to the identities of the victims

remarks on sentence

  1. The offender, Mr Ali Moh’d, stood trial before a jury between 8 July and 6 August 2024 on an indictment containing eight counts. On that latter date, the jury found him guilty of counts 1, 4, 5 and 6 but not guilty of the remainder.

  2. The offences for which he is therefore to be sentenced involve three counts of aggravated sexual touching. Those being counts 1, 4 and 6. Each of those are offences under s 61KD(1)(a) of the Crimes Act 1900 and each of them carry a maximum penalty of seven years imprisonment and each of them have specified a standard non-parole period of five years. Furthermore, there is count number 5 which is an offence under s 61J(1) of the Crimes Act being an offence of aggravated sexual assault. And, of course, in the case of all of the offences, they involve a circumstance of aggravation, that being that the victim in each case was under the authority of the offender. In the count 5 offence, the maximum penalty specified is 20 years imprisonment and a standard non-parole period is specified of ten years.

  3. The maximum penalty and the standard non-parole periods are, of course, important guideposts or yardsticks in the sentencing exercise to which I must have and have had regard.

FACTS

  1. Turning then to factual matters. The facts for the purposes of sentence are to be determined by myself but must be consistent with the verdicts of the jury. Any matters of aggravation must be proved beyond reasonable doubt. However, matters in mitigation need only be proved on the balance of probabilities.

  2. I find the following facts. The offender was at all relevant times a nurse. At the time of the offences, he was employed as a Clinical Nurse Specialist and worked at Nepean Private Hospital and Norwest Private Hospital and generally worked in the intensive care and coronary care areas.

  3. The count 1…

Continue reading R v Moh'd

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Moh'd [2024] NSWDC 522
Case
[2024] NSWDC 522
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of R v Moh'd, the defendant was convicted and sentenced for various criminal offences by a court in Australia. The nature of the dispute involved multiple counts of serious criminal activities, which led to the defendant being brought before the court to face justice.

The legal issues the court was required to decide primarily revolved around the appropriate sentences for each of the counts against the defendant. This involved not only determining the length of the sentences but also deciding on the non-parole periods for each offence. The court had to balance the severity of the crimes with the principles of justice and deterrence, considering the totality of the defendant's criminal history and the impact of the crimes on the victims.

The court meticulously evaluated each count, taking into account the specifics of the offences, the defendant's criminal history, and the need for deterrence and rehabilitation. It found special circumstances that warranted a comprehensive approach to sentencing, resulting in an aggregate term of imprisonment of five years and two months, with a non-parole period of three years and six months. The indicative sentences for each count varied, reflecting the gravity of the offences and the need for an appropriate punitive response.

The final orders mandated that the defendant be convicted and sentenced according to the detailed terms specified, with the sentences to commence from specific dates and extend to others, ensuring that the defendant's incarceration aligns with the court's determination of justice and deterrence.

Orders

Orders of the court

Convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 5 years 2 months with a NPP of 3 years 6 months (5/8/24-4/2/28). I find special circumstances.

Indicative sentences:

Count 1 – 12 months with NPP 8 months

Count 2 – 18 months with NPP 12 months

Count 5 – 4 years 2 months with NPP 33 months

Count 6 – 12 months with NPP 8 months.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.