District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v McGaw [2022] NSWDC 101 Hearing dates: 11 March 2022 Date of orders: 11 March 2022 Decision date: 11 March 2022 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler DCJ Decision: Full time custodial order to be served by way of an intensive correctional order. For orders see [34].
Catchwords: CRIME – Aggravated enter dwelling with intent, knowing people there - Common assault
SENTENCING - Relevant factors on sentence – early plea – failed attempt to regain stolen property by intimidation – in company – in victim’s home - offender of prior good character- purposes of sentencing discussed -
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act1900
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999Cases Cited: Category: Sentence Parties: Dean Alan McGaw (the offender)
Director of Public ProsecutionsRepresentation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr E Anderson (for the offender)
Morrisons Law (for the offender)
(Mr L McGonigal (for Director of Public Prosecutions)
File Number(s): 2021/00015996
SENTENCE – EX TEMPORE REVISED
Introduction
-
Dean McGaw has accepted responsibility and is to be sentenced today for two serious offences. The first, aggravated enter a dwelling with intent to commit an indictable offence, namely intimidation, the aggravation circumstances knowing people were there; an offence pursuant to s 111(2) Crimes Act1900 carries a maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment. He also pleaded guilty to common assault, s 61 Crimes Act 1900. It carries a maximum penalty of two years.
-
McGaw asked that when I sentence him for the aggravated enter dwelling offence that I take into account on a Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, Form 1, an offence of occasioning actual bodily harm in company: s 59(2) Crimes Act. I will take that matter into account when I come to fix an appropriate sentence for the aggravated enter dwelling offence. It forms part of the general matrix of everything that happened on the evening in question. I do not impose a sentence for that offence, but it does require some additional weight to be given to specific deterrence and community protection and a very modest increase in the sentence for the aggravated enter dwelling offence, primarily because a separate victim was involved.
Plea
-
Because McGaw pleaded guilty in the Local Court, I will reduce the otherwise indicated sentences by 25% to recognise the utilitarian value of his plea of guilty: s 25D Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act. The plea also shows acceptance of responsibility. It is a measure of the man who, despite having some matters on his record from many years ago, I will treat as a first offender. He appears to be an otherwise upstanding member of the community, who has provided community service to local sporting clubs, I presume, in a voluntary capacity.
-
When crimes are committed against people it can cause a visceral; a gut, reaction. When you have saved hard to purchase something that is special to you and your family and someone turns up and helps themselves to it, victims can feel…
Continue reading R v McGaw
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v McGaw [2022] NSWDC 101
- Case
- [2022] NSWDC 101
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court was required to address included the appropriate weight to be given to McGaw's early plea and the nature of his involvement in the crime. The court also had to consider the purposes of sentencing, including general and specific deterrence, denunciation, and the protection of society. Additionally, the court examined McGaw's prior good character and the circumstances under which the crime was committed, including the fact that it occurred in the victim's home and McGaw was in the company of his accomplice.
The court found that McGaw's early plea and his prior good character were mitigating factors. However, the aggravating factors included the seriousness of the crime, the use of intimidation, and the fact that the crime was committed in the victim's home. The court determined that the purposes of sentencing necessitated a sentence that would adequately deter McGaw and others from committing similar crimes. Ultimately, the court imposed a full-time custodial order to be served by way of an intensive correctional order, considering it a suitable balance between punishment and rehabilitation.
The final orders included a full-time custodial sentence to be served through an intensive correctional order, with specific details outlined in the court's reasons at [34].
Orders
Orders of the court
Full time custodial order to be served by way of an intensive correctional order. For orders see [34].
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.