R v Malakai Glen Braithwaite

Link copied
Case Copied 19 min read

District Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Malakai Glen BRAITHWAITE [2023] NSWDC 480
Hearing dates: 10 March 2023 (offender gave evidence)
15 March 2023 (expert gave evidence)
10 May 2023 (expert gave evidence again)
18 May 2023 (expert gave evidence for a third time)
6 July 2023 (submissions and remarks)
Date of orders: 6 July 2023
Decision date: 06 July 2023
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Wilson SC DCJ
Decision:

2 years 10 months Head Sentence, 1 year 8 months Non-Parole Period. Decision at [58] – [60]

Catchwords:

CRIME – Sentencing – Larceny – Assault with intent to rob with an offensive weapon

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act (1999)

Cases Cited:

R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346

Stanley v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2023] HCA 3

Bugmy v R (2013) 302 ALR 192

Texts Cited:

None.

Category:Sentence
Parties: R (Crown)
Braithwaite (Offender)
Representation: Solicitors:
Ms Scott (Crown)
Ms Martinez (Offender)
File Number(s): 2022/0006437
Publication restriction: Nil.

Ex Tempore JUDGMENT

INTRODUCTION

  1. The offender appears to be sentenced in respect of two charges: one being larceny comprising one chicken wrap and a packet of lollies valued at $9.50 in breach of s 117 of the Crimes Act. It carries a maximum penalty of five years imprisonment.

  2. Sequence 4 is far more serious, that is assault with intent to rob armed with an offensive weapon in breach of s 97(1) of the Crimes Act. Twenty years imprisonment is the maximum penalty.

  3. The offending took place 9 January 2022. The offender was arrested and bail refused the same day. He was committed to sentence from the Local Court and the timing of his plea entitles him to a discount of 25%.

  4. His time in custody has been difficult and I note that on 24 January 2022 he was involved in assaulting a correctives services officer. He was arrested the same day and bail refused in relation to that. He was eventually sentenced on 28 July 2022 and received a community corrections order that will expire 27 July 2024.

  5. On 9 February 2022, the offender also engaged in further offending whilst in custody, namely assaulting a correctives officer. He was charged on 10 February 2022 and upon sentence on 28 July 2022 was sentenced to a period of 7 months imprisonment commencing 9 February 2022 through to 8 September 2022.

  6. A third incident occurred on 10 May 2022, when the offender was involved in an altercation with his cellmate. He was later charged with assault occasioning actual bodily harm and reckless wounding. He was bail-refused. I understand that the offender has pleaded not guilty in relation to this incident and that those matters are listed for trial in the Downing Centre in Sydney on 6 November 2023.

  7. The relevance is that not all the time spent in custody is referrable to the subject offending. In fact, the solely referrable period is a period of just 15 days between 9 January 2022 and…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read R v Malakai Glen Braithwaite and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2023] NSWDC 480
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of R v Malakai Glen Braithwaite involved the defendant, Braithwaite, who was convicted of multiple offences including larceny and assault with intent to rob while armed with an offensive weapon. The matter was heard and determined by the sentencing court. Braithwaite's criminal conduct, which involved a series of thefts and a violent assault, necessitated a thorough examination of the principles of sentencing, particularly in relation to the nature and circumstances of the offences committed.

The legal issues before the court encompassed the appropriate assessment of the seriousness of Braithwaite's criminal behaviour, the necessity for punishment and deterrence, and the potential for rehabilitation. The court had to consider the totality of Braithwaite's offending history, the circumstances surrounding each offence, and the impact of his actions on the victims and the community. Additionally, the court needed to weigh the aggravating factors, such as the use of an offensive weapon, against any mitigating factors present in Braithwaite's case.

The court meticulously evaluated the evidence and submissions, ultimately determining that the appropriate sentence for Braithwaite should reflect the gravity of his crimes and the need to protect the community. The sentencing judge concluded that a head sentence of two years and ten months was warranted, with a non-parole period of one year and eight months. This decision was reached after considering the cumulative effect of Braithwaite's offending, his criminal history, and the principles of just punishment and deterrence. The detailed reasoning and application of sentencing principles can be found in the judgment from paragraph [58] to [60].

The final orders of the court mandated a custodial sentence for Braithwaite, specifying the head sentence and the non-parole period as outlined in the judgment. The court's decision underscored the importance of ensuring that sentences are proportionate to the crimes committed, while also considering the broader objectives of sentencing in the criminal justice system.

Orders

Orders of the court

2 years 10 months Head Sentence, 1 year 8 months Non-Parole Period. Decision at [58] – [60]

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.