R v MA

Case [2024] NSWDC 288


District Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: R v MA [2024] NSWDC 288
Hearing dates: 24 May 2024
Date of orders: 24 May 2024
Decision date: 24 May 2024
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Newlinds SC DCJ
Decision:

(1)   Appeal allowed.

(2)   If necessary, set aside the conviction entered by the Magistrate on 13 November 2023, and set aside the sentence of the Magistrate entered on 22 February 2024.

Catchwords:

CRIME – Appeal from conviction of sexual intercourse without consent in Local Court – Identity – Crown concession that offence not proved beyond reasonable doubt – Appeal allowed

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 61I

Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) s 11; s 18

Cases Cited:

Charara v R [2006] 164 A Crim R 39

Dyason v Butterworth [2015] NSWCA 52

McNab v DPP [2021] NSWCA 298

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Rex
MA (Appellant)
Representation:

Counsel:
C Ervin (Crown)
A Reslan (Appellant)

Solicitors:
File Number(s): 2021/265702
Publication restriction: Non-publication restriction

JUDGMENT: Ex tempore

  1. The Appellant is now aged 18, was aged 14 in November 2020. He was charged with a single offence of sexual intercourse without consent contrary to s 61I of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW). As the Appellant was a juvenile at the time, the matter was heard in the Children’s Court.

  2. The Appellant entered a plea of not guilty and the matter was heard by a Magistrate in the Children’s Court over five days of evidence from 11 October, 13 October, 14 October 2022, 15 June 2023, and 16 June 2023.

  3. After hearing submissions, the Magistrate delivered judgment on 13 November 2023, the Appellant was found guilty. Sentence was delivered on 22 February 2024. The Appellant appeals against both the conviction entered by the Magistrate and the sentence.

  4. Section 11 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) provides for an appeal as a right for any person who has been convicted or sentenced by the Local Court. Section 3 defines the Local Court to include the Children’s Court.

  5. An appeal against conviction proceeds under s 18 by way of a rehearing on the basis of the evidence given before the Local Court subject to certain exceptions.

  6. It is well understood on such an appeal, the judge on appeal forms his or her own view of the facts, recognising the considerable advantage though that Magistrates who have heard and seen witnesses have when assessing matters such as credit. See for example Dyason v Butterworth [2015] NSWCA 52. A judge is entitled to consider the reasons of the Magistrate, including as to findings of credibility: Charara v R [2006] 164 A Crim R 39. In order for an appeal to succeed, the Court needs to be satisfied that the ultimately result that the conclusion of the Magistrate in terms of a conviction is not correct: McNab v DPP [2021] NSWCA 298.

  7. The Appellant has put comprehensive submissions before me in writing contained in an outline of submissions document signed by…

Continue reading R v MA

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v MA [2024] NSWDC 288
Case
[2024] NSWDC 288
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appellant, MA, was convicted in the Local Court of sexual intercourse without consent. The matter came before the court on appeal, with the Crown conceding that the conviction could not be sustained as the evidence did not prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt. The appeal centred on the identity of the perpetrator and the sufficiency of the evidence presented.

The primary issue for determination was whether the evidence was sufficient to prove beyond reasonable doubt that MA was the person who committed the offence. The Crown's concession that the evidence did not meet this standard was pivotal. The court needed to assess whether the concession was appropriate and whether the conviction should be upheld or set aside.

The court found that the Crown's concession was well-founded. The evidence did not establish the identity of the offender with the requisite certainty, and therefore the conviction could not be sustained. The appeal was allowed, and the conviction and sentence were set aside. The court recognised the importance of ensuring that convictions are based on evidence that meets the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt, particularly in cases involving serious allegations of sexual offences.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) Appeal allowed.

(2) If necessary, set aside the conviction entered by the Magistrate on 13 November 2023, and set aside the sentence of the Magistrate entered on 22 February 2024.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.