District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Lynch [2024] NSWDC 92 Hearing dates: 19 March 2024 Date of orders: 27 March 2024 Decision date: 27 March 2024 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Newlinds SC DCJ Decision: Sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment for a period of 6 years with a minimum non-parole period of 3 years. [145]-[148]
Catchwords: CRIME – Sentence – firearms – possess pistol – possess ammunition - contravention of Firearms Prohibition Order
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)
Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW)
Drug Misuse & Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW)
Firearms Act 1900 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Callaghan v R [2006] NSWCCA 58
DPP (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1
Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120
R v Millwood [2012] NSWCCA
R v Osenkowski
R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212
Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465
Texts Cited: The Bugmy Bar Book Project, ‘Childhood Sexual Abuse, ‘Executive Summary’ (November 2019).
The Bugmy Bar Book Project, Impacts of Imprisonment and Remand in Custody, ‘Executive Summary’ (November 2022).
Category: Sentence Parties: Rex (Crown)
Malachi Lynch (Offender)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
M Franklin (Crown)
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Aboriginal Legal Service (Offender)
File Number(s): 2021/00236133 Publication restriction: None
JUDGMENT
Introduction
-
The offender is before me for sentence in relation to the following Firearms offences to which he has pleaded guilty:
Possess pistol in contravention of Firearms Prohibition Order, contrary to s74(1) of the Firearms Act 1900 (NSW). The maximum penalty for this offence is 14 years imprisonment. There is no standard non-parole period specified.
Possess ammunition in contravention of Firearms Prohibition Order, contrary to s74(3) of the Firearms Act 1900 (NSW). The maximum penalty for this offence is 5 years imprisonment. There is no standard non-parole period specified.
-
There are matters to be dealt pursuant to s166(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) for the following drug supply related offences:
Ongoing supply prohibited drug – Methylamphetamine (7.07 grams) contrary to s25A of the Drug Misuse & Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW). The maximum penalty and jurisdictional limit is 2 years imprisonment and/or a fine of 100 penalty units;
Supply prohibited drug, cannabis leaf (63 grams), contrary to s25 of the Drug Misuse & Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW). The maximum penalty and jurisdictional limit is 2 years imprisonment and/or a fine of 100 penalty units;
Deal with property reasonably suspected proceeds of crime, contrary to s193C(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ($4,810). The maximum penalty and jurisdictional limit is 2 years imprisonment and/or a fine of 50 penalty units; and
Deal with…
Continue reading R v Lynch
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Lynch [2024] NSWDC 92
- Case
- [2024] NSWDC 92
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included the seriousness of the offences, the respondent's criminal history, and the need for deterrence and rehabilitation. The court considered the principles of sentencing, including the gravity of the offence, the protection of the community, and the respondent's prospects of rehabilitation. The court also took into account the respondent's guilty plea and his expression of remorse.
The court found that the offences were serious and had significant implications for public safety. The respondent had a history of offending, and the court considered that a substantial term of imprisonment was necessary to adequately reflect the seriousness of the offences and to deter the respondent and others from engaging in similar conduct. The court imposed an aggregate term of imprisonment for a period of 6 years with a minimum non-parole period of 3 years. The court considered this sentence to be appropriate in the circumstances, balancing the need for punishment, deterrence, and rehabilitation.
The final orders of the court were that the respondent be sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment for a period of 6 years with a minimum non-parole period of 3 years.
Orders
Orders of the court
Sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment for a period of 6 years with a minimum non-parole period of 3 years. [145]-[148]
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.