R v LTP

DUNFORD J DUNFORD J Count 1: sexual intercourse without consent with person under 16 years (6 years) between 31 January 1984 and 1 June 1984:  not guilty verdict Videos Exhibit H Letters Delay in complaint Reporting of sexual assault allegations The appellant’s case at trial Complainant seeking to withdraw complaint Conferences with DPP staff in 2002 Ground 1: The learned trial judge did not give adequate direction as to effect of “delay in complaint” upon the credit of the complainant. Kilby v The Queen Crofts v The Queen R v BWT R v DJK R v BWT Longman v The Queen Crampton v The Queen Jones v The Queen R v DJK R v Stringer Green v The Queen Ground 5: There is fresh evidence which gives rise to a miscarriage of justice. Bikic Spies v The Queen Jones v Dunkel Jones v Dunkel Festa v The Queen R v PLV R v Durocher-Yvon SIMPSON J Kilby v The Queen Kilby HOWIE J Kilby v The Queen Crofts v The Queen Crofts Markuleski R v Davies Markuleski Crofts Markuleski Markuleski Davies R v Williams it may be because of a consideration of credibility, then having found him credible on the evidence of one charge, you must consider that credibility on the other charges