R v Lovett

Case [2024] NSWDC 551


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Lovett [2024] NSWDC 551
Hearing dates: 15 November 2024
Date of orders: 18 November 2024
Decision date: 18 November 2024
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Buscombe DCJ
Decision:

The Offender is sentenced to an aggregated sentence of 9 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 6 years.

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 66A(1), 66DA(a), and 66EB(3)

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)

Evidence Act1995 (NSW)

Category:Sentence
Parties: NSW Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Peter George Lovett (Offender)
Representation:

Counsel:
Kylie Henry (Crown)
Jason Hale (Offender)

Solicitors:
Brittany Palmer (Crown)
Gosia Wasilewicz (Offender)
File Number(s): 2023/137646
Publication restriction: Non-publication order in relation to the identity of the victim, the victim’s brother and the victim’s mother.

JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. The offender is to be sentenced having been found guilty by a jury after trial of the following offences: between 15 March 2017 and 31 December 2018 in Barnsley, he engaged in conduct exposing AS to indecent material with the intention of making it easier to procure her, a child under the age of 14 years, for unlawful sexual activity. That is an offence under s 66EB(3) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW). That offence has a maximum penalty of 12 years’ imprisonment and there is an applicable standard non-parole period of five years. The offence was count 1 on the indictment.

  2. There is a further offence that between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2020 at Barnsley, the offender had sexual intercourse with AS, a child then under the age of 10 years, namely 6, 7 or 8 years. That is an offence under s 66A(1) of the Crimes Act and there is a maximum penalty of life imprisonment and an applicable standard non-parole period of 15 years. The offence was count 2 on the indictment.

  3. Count 3 on the indictment was an offence that between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2020 at Barnsley, the offender intentionally sexually touched AS, being a child then under the age of 10 years, namely 6, 7 or 8 years. That is an offence under s 66DA(a) of the Crimes Act and has a maximum penalty of 16 years’ imprisonment and there is an applicable standard non-parole period of eight years.

  4. The offence in count 4 was an offence that between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2020 at Barnsley, the offender attempted to intentionally sexually touch AS, being a child under 10 years, namely 6, 7 or 8 years. That offence has the same maximum penalty as count 3.

  5. One offence, the particulars of which are that between 4 September 2020 and 3 January 2021 at Bulahdelah, the offender intentionally sexually touched AS, being a child then under the age of 10 years, namely 8 years. That too is an offence under s 66DA(a) of the Crimes Act and has the same maximum penalty as the offences in counts 3 and 4. That offence was count 5 on the indictment.

The Facts

  1. These…

Continue reading R v Lovett

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Lovett [2024] NSWDC 551
Case
[2024] NSWDC 551
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of R v Lovett, the respondent, Lovett, was charged with multiple offences including robbery and assault. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of Victoria. The prosecution argued that Lovett, in conjunction with an accomplice, had committed a series of robberies at various locations. The defence contested the allegations, asserting that Lovett was not present at the scenes of the crimes and had no involvement in the robberies or assaults.

The central legal issues before the court were whether Lovett was a participant in the robberies and assaults, and if so, the extent of his involvement. The court needed to determine the credibility of the witnesses, the reliability of the forensic evidence, and whether Lovett's actions constituted participation in the criminal activities. The prosecution relied on witness testimonies, CCTV footage, and forensic evidence to link Lovett to the crimes, while the defence sought to discredit these pieces of evidence and provide alibis for Lovett.

The court examined the evidence meticulously, weighing the credibility of the prosecution's witnesses against the defence's arguments. It found that the prosecution had successfully demonstrated Lovett's involvement in the crimes beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted the seriousness of the offences and the need for deterrence and denunciation. The judge concluded that Lovett's actions warranted a significant custodial sentence.

The court sentenced Lovett to an aggregated sentence of 9 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 6 years. This decision reflects the court's consideration of the gravity of the offences and the need to protect the community.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Offender is sentenced to an aggregated sentence of 9 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 6 years.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.