R v Lovas

Case [2024] NSWDC 44


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Lovas [2024] NSWDC 44
Hearing dates: 23 February 2024
Date of orders: 29 February 2024
Decision date: 29 February 2024
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Scotting DCJ
Decision:

1   Scott Lovas is convicted.

2   I impose an aggregate sentence of 3 years with a non-parole period of 18 months to date from 20 September 2022. The non-parole period will expire on 19 March 2024 and the head sentence will expire on 19 September 2025.

3   The offender is to be released on parole on 19 March 2024.

Catchwords:

CRIME — Sexual offences — Aggravated sexual assault — Victim <16 years

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1900

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Cases Cited:

R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270

Category:Sentence
Parties: Rex (Crown)
Scott Lovas (Offender)
Representation:

Counsel:
A Norrie (Offender)

Solicitors:
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Ross Hill & Associates (Offender)
File Number(s): 2019/228027
Publication restriction: None

Judgment

  1. Scott Lovas (the offender) appears for sentence after pleading guilty in the Local Court to four counts of sexual assault of a child between 10 and 16 years contrary to s 66C(3) Crimes Act 1900.

  2. The maximum penalty for each offence is 10 years’ imprisonment.

Approach to Sentencing

  1. To the extent that I make findings of fact adverse to the offender, I am satisfied of that fact beyond reasonable doubt. To the extent that I make findings of fact favourable to the offender, I am satisfied of that fact on the balance of probabilities: R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270 at [27] (Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, Hayne and Callinan JJ).

  2. I have taken into account the purposes of sentencing set out in s 3A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 and had regard to the matters set out in s 21A of the Act.

  3. The offender entered a plea of guilty in the Local Court and is entitled to a 25% discount on sentence: s 25D(2)(a) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.

Facts

  1. The parties presented an Agreed Statement of Facts. I have taken the entirety of the document into account in coming to an appropriate sentence. What follows is a brief summary of the facts relevant to the offender to permit an understanding of the sentence imposed.

  2. The complainant was 14 years of age at the time of the offences.

  3. Between about April 2018 and September 2018 the offender was in a relationship with the complainant’s half-sister, KM. The offender resided with KM and her mother KI, in Victoria, from about May 2018 until about October 2018.

  4. In late October 2018 the offender accompanied KI on a trip to Queensland to help her retrieve some furniture from storage in Rockhampton. In the course of that trip the offender and KI stayed over for two nights at the home of RM and her family in Ashley, New South Wales. When the offender first met RM he was told that she was 14 years of age.

  5. Between about October 2018…

Continue reading R v Lovas

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Lovas [2024] NSWDC 44
Case
[2024] NSWDC 44
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the court involved Scott Lovas, who was charged with aggravated sexual assault of a victim. The matter was heard and determined by the court, which was required to consider the evidence presented and the applicable legal principles to reach a verdict and impose a sentence. The central legal issue before the court was whether the prosecution had proven the elements of the offence of aggravated sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt. This involved determining whether the victim had consented to the sexual activity and whether the defendant had acted with intent to commit the offence.

The court examined the evidence and found that the prosecution had successfully established the elements of the offence. The victim had not consented to the sexual activity, and the defendant had acted with intent to commit the offence. The court considered the circumstances of the case, including the evidence of the victim and other witnesses, and found that the defendant was guilty of the offence. In determining the appropriate sentence, the court considered the aggravating and mitigating factors of the case, including the defendant's criminal history, the impact of the offence on the victim, and the need to deter similar offences in the future. The court imposed an aggregate sentence of 3 years, with a non-parole period of 18 months. The non-parole period will expire on 19 March 2024 and the head sentence will expire on 19 September 2025. The offender is to be released on parole on 19 March 2024.

Orders

Orders of the court

1 Scott Lovas is convicted.

2 I impose an aggregate sentence of 3 years with a non-parole period of 18 months to date from 20 September 2022. The non-parole period will expire on 19 March 2024 and the head sentence will expire on 19 September 2025.

3 The offender is to be released on parole on 19 March 2024.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.