District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Lizano [2021] NSWDC 54 Hearing dates: 14 December 2020 Date of orders: 22 January 2021 Decision date: 22 January 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Buscombe DCJ Decision: Sentenced to an aggregate term of 6 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 4 years
Catchwords: CRIME — Firearms offences — Unauthorised use/possession of firearm
CRIME — Domestic violence — Stalking or intimidation
Legislation Cited: Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) s 61(2B)
Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act2007 (NSW) s 13
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 3A
Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW) s 18B
Category: Sentence Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Norman Lizano (Offender)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Ms Marsh (Crown)
Mr Dikha (Offender)
File Number(s): 2019/345243 Publication restriction: Nil
SENTENCE
Introduction
-
The offender stands to be sentenced, having pleaded guilty to the following three offences. That on 30 October 2019 at The Ponds, he possessed a shortened firearm that was not a pistol, namely a shortened double barrel shotgun, without being authorised to do so by a permit. The second offence is that on the same date and place, he possessed a shortened firearm, namely a shortened .22 long rifle calibre Anschutz single shot bolt action rifle that was not a pistol, without being authorised to do so by a permit or licence. Both of those offences are offences under s 62(1B) of the Firearms Act and they have a maximum penalty of 14 years’ imprisonment. The third offence is an offence that on the same date and at the same place, he intimidated Sarah Peebles with the intention of causing her to fear physical or mental harm. That is an offence under s 13 of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act and has a maximum penalty of five years’ imprisonment and/or a fine equivalent to 50 penalty units. None of the offences have an applicable standard non-parole period.
Form 1 offences
-
When sentencing the offender in relation to the possession offence which relates to the shortened double barrel shotgun, he acknowledges his guilt in relation to the following two offences on a form 1, and asks that I take those two offences into account when I sentence him on that offence. They are two offences of possession of a pistol, not being authorised to do so. If those offences were dealt with as substantive offences, they carry a maximum penalty of 14 years’ imprisonment and there would be an applicable standard non-parole period. The offences on the form 1 are clearly serious offences and must have some impact on the sentence I will impose on the possess shortened shotgun offence.
The Facts
-
The facts are agreed and the following is taken from them. The victim of the domestic violence offence is Sarah Peebles. She and the offender resided at 100 The Ponds Boulevard with the offender’s sister and her partner, Tane Keel, and their three children from July 2019 to 30 October 2019. They had been in an…
Continue reading R v Lizano
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Lizano [2021] NSWDC 54
- Case
- [2021] NSWDC 54
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court needed to address were the validity of the evidence provided by the prosecution and whether it met the requisite standard of proof. Additionally, the court had to consider the seriousness of the offences and determine an appropriate sentence if Lizano was found guilty. The court had to weigh the gravity of the firearms offences against the stalking and intimidation charges, taking into account the impact on the victim and the principles of justice and deterrence.
The Supreme Court, after reviewing the evidence, found Lizano guilty on all counts. The court held that the prosecution had presented sufficient evidence to establish the unauthorised possession and use of the firearm, as well as the stalking and intimidation offences. In sentencing, the court considered the severity of the offences, the defendant's criminal history, and the need for general deterrence. Consequently, Lizano was sentenced to an aggregate term of 6 years imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 4 years.
Orders
Orders of the court
Sentenced to an aggregate term of 6 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 4 years
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.