R v Liddicoat

Case

[1996] QCA 439

24/10/96

No judgment structure available for this case.

[1996] QCA 439

COURT OF APPEAL

FITZGERALD P
DAVIES JA
AMBROSE J

CA No 357 of 1996

THE QUEEN

v.

KYM ROSS LIDDICOAT  Applicant

BRISBANE

DATE 24/10/96

JUDGMENT

THE PRESIDENT:  In this matter in view of the course which the proceedings have taken the Court thinks it unnecessary to give detailed reasons for its Judgment.

The applicant has applied for leave to appeal against sentences imposed in the Supreme Court trial division on 26 July 1996 in respect of offences of trafficking an amphetamine between 27 July 1995 and 20 September 1995, possession of a police scanner, phone and scales between the same dates, possession of amphetamine on 29 July 1995 and possession of cannabis sativa on 30 July 1995.

He is 33 years of age and has some previous convictions both for drug offences and both relatively minor in that he was fined only on each occasion.  It is not necessary to go into the details of the offences here nor is it suggested by either counsel that the head sentence was wrong.  The applicant was sentenced to five years' imprisonment for trafficking, three years' imprisonment for possession of the police scanner, phone and scales and convicted, not punished for the possession of amphetamine and cannabis sativa.

In view of the circumstance that the applicant pleaded to an ex officio indictment and otherwise cooperated extensively with police it is conceded by the respondent that there should have been a recommendation for consideration for release on parole which the sentencing Judge omitted to include in the sentence.  There is also common ground that the period that the applicant should serve before being considered eligible for release on parole is 12 months.

Accordingly, I would grant the application, allow the appeal only to the extent that the sentences are confirmed save that it is recommended that the applicant be considered for release on parole after serving 12 months' imprisonment.

DAVIES JA:  I agree.

AMBROSE J:  I agree.

THE PRESIDENT:  The orders are as I have indicated.

-----

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
R v Wilson [2021] QCA 115

Cases Citing This Decision

1

R v Wilson [2021] QCA 115
Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0