District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Lawrence [2024] NSWDC 667 Hearing dates: 19 December 2024 Date of orders: 19 December 2024 Decision date: 19 December 2024 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: Aggregate sentence of imprisonment of 3 years with a non-parole period of 1 year and 8 months
Catchwords: CRIME — Driving offences — Dangerous driving occasioning grievous bodily harm
CRIME — Public justice offences — Escape police custody
TRAFFIC LAW AND TRANSPORT — Traffic law — Offences — Drive motor vehicle during disqualification period
SENTENCING — Aggravating factors — Breach of conditional liberty — Record of previous convictions
SENTENCING — Guidelines for sentencing — Role of guidelines
SENTENCING — Mitigating factors — Plea of guilty
SENTENCING — Penalties — Imprisonment
SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Deterrence — Specific deterrence — Multiple offences — Totality — Moral culpability — Objective seriousness — Proportionality
SENTENCING — Subjective considerations on sentence — Drug and alcohol addiction — Mental health — Antisocial — Childhood deprivation — Childhood trauma and sexual abuse
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)
Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW)
Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; (2013) 249 CLR 571
Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194
Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357
Nasrallah v R [2021] NSWCCA 207
R v Errington (2005) 157 A Crim R 553
R vGeddes (1936) 36 SR (NSW) 554
R v Herring (1956) 73 WN (NSW) 203
Category: Sentence Parties: Steven Lewis James Lawrence (the offender)
Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown)Representation: Solicitors:
A Socorro solicitor for Legal Aid (NSW) (for the offender)
J Azad solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown)
File Number(s): 2023/220982
JUDGMENT – ex tempore revised
Introduction
-
On 11 July 2019 I sentenced Steven Lawrence for very serious offending. At the conclusion of my judgment I noted:
“He has been before the courts many times. He has been in prison many times. He has been given and breached supervised orders many times. Harsh punishments have not deterred him. To the contrary, it appears he has learnt many negative lessons from imprisonment. He may have learnt more negative ones than positive ones. Except for a very short period, he has never lived a normal community life. He had no grounding, until he took up with Ms Hamilton, in normal community life. He has few skills to equip him for life, other than crime, but he has shown some capacity to work in the community.”: R v Lawrence [2019] NSWDC 666 at [33].
-
After serving the non-parole period I imposed upon him he was admitted to parole on 7 July…
Continue reading R v Lawrence
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Lawrence [2024] NSWDC 667
- Case
- [2024] NSWDC 667
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the sentence imposed by the lower court was appropriate, considering the totality of the circumstances, including Lawrence's previous criminal history, his plea of guilty, and mitigating factors such as his drug and alcohol addiction, mental health issues, and background of childhood deprivation and trauma. The court also needed to assess whether the sentence met the objectives of specific deterrence, general deterrence, and proportionality, while taking into account the guidelines for sentencing.
The Court of Criminal Appeal found that the original sentence was manifestly inadequate, given the objective seriousness of the offences and Lawrence's history of criminal conduct. Despite acknowledging mitigating factors, the court determined that the sentence needed to reflect the gravity of the crimes and the necessity for deterrence. Consequently, the appeal was upheld, and a new sentence was imposed. This sentence comprised an aggregate term of imprisonment of three years, with a non-parole period of one year and eight months, aimed at achieving the appropriate balance between punishment, deterrence, and rehabilitation.
Orders
Orders of the court
Aggregate sentence of imprisonment of 3 years with a non-parole period of 1 year and 8 months
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.