R v Lam (No 28)
[2005] VSC 413
•15 July 2005
| IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA | Not Restricted |
AT MELBOURNE
CRIMINAL DIVISION
No. 1505 of 2003
| THE QUEEN |
| v |
| CUONG QUOC LAM & ORS |
---
JUDGE: | Redlich J | |
WHERE HELD: | Melbourne | |
DATE OF HEARING: | 24 January 2005 to 19 September 2005 | |
DATE OF RULING: | 15 July 2005 | |
CASE MAY BE CITED AS: | R v Lam & Ors | |
MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: | [2005] VSC 413 | |
RULING NO. 28
Principals in the first degree - Alternative of manslaughter open.
---
APPEARANCES: | Counsel | Solicitors |
| For the Crown | Mr M. Dean S.C. with Mr P. Southey | Mr S. Carisbrooke, Acting Solicitor for Public Prosecutions |
| For Cuong Quoc Lam | Mr S. Grant | Michael Gleeson & Associates |
| For Hung Tu Van | Mr A. Jackson | Haines & Polities |
| For Linh Van Nguyen | Mr D. Brustman | Valos Black & Associates |
| For Thanh Nha Nguyen | Mr F. Gucciardo | Theo Magazis & Associates |
| For Long Thanh Tran | Mr G. Mullaly | Victoria Legal Aid |
| For Hong Bui | Mr J. Saunders | Valos Black & Associates |
| For Hoang Tran | Mr M. Rochford | Brendan Wilkinson |
HIS HONOUR:
In relation to the principals in the first degree, I will leave the alternative of manslaughter open in each of their cases on the bases I have just indicated. In David Nguyen’s case, manslaughter may be open if the jury concluded he did make the admissions alleged but they were admissions to no more than an unlawful and dangerous act and that he did not have the necessary intent for the crime of murder.
Counsel will address the jury as they see fit in relation to those alternatives.
0
0
0