Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
4
-
R v CS
[2019] NSWDC 875
Citation 1
(Para 32)
…In R v Laird (1839) NSWLR 354 in the context of determining the admissibility of a second confession after a first confession was determined to be inadmissible, having been obtained after an impermissible inducement, Windeyer J made observations at p 358 that it was for the Crown to establish that the pre‑existing…
-
R v Fantakis, Woods and Cheong
[2018] NSWSC 749
Citation 2
(Para 50)
…The authorities cited by his Honour were R v Laird (1893) 14 NSWLR 354; R v Thompson and Gamble (1925) 42 WN (NSW) 71; McManamy v Fleming (1889) 15 VLR 337; Gregory (1981) 77 Cr. App. R. 41 at 47; Falconer-Atlee (1973) 58 Cr. App. R. 348 at 355 - 356; and Cross and Channon (1973) 55 Cr. App. R. 540 at 545 - 546.…
-
Pafitis v The Queen
[2000] TASSC 52
Citation 3
(Para 1)
…of the Crown involved such a change in the course of the trial at such a late stage that inevitably the conviction could not be allowed to stand: see Reg v Laird (1893) 14 NSWR 354; R v Thompson and Gamble (1925) 42 WN (NSW) 71 ; McManamy v Fleming (1889) 15 VLR 337 ; Gregory (1981) 77 Cr App R 41, at p 47) ; Falcone…
-
King v The Queen
[1986] HCA 59
Citation 4
…7. No exception was taken before us to the finding of an irregularity or the quashing of the conviction. Indeed, it may be said that the direction given by the trial judge at the behest of the Crown involved such a change in the course of the trial at such a late stage that inevitably the conviction…
Statutory Material Cited
0