R v Lado
Case
•
[2020] SASC 223
•13 November 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Lado [2020] SASC 223
[2020] SASC 223
13 November 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the case of R v Lado, the defendant, Mr Lado, was charged with the offence of attempted murder for unlawfully attacking his stepbrother. The prosecution and defence jointly requested the court to establish a finding that the objective element of the offence was met. The case came before a South Australian court which exercised jurisdiction over the matter.
The court was required to address two primary legal issues. First, whether Mr Lado was mentally competent to commit the offence of attempted murder at the time of the attack, and second, if the objective element of the attempted murder offence had been established. The defence of mental incompetence was raised, which required the court to examine the defendant's mental state at the relevant time.
The court found that Mr Lado was mentally incompetent to commit the offence of attempted murder at the time of the attack, thereby absolving him of criminal liability for the offence. The court declared Mr Lado liable to supervision under Part 8A of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA) for a limiting term to be determined. An order committing Mr Lado to detention was made, with the direction for reports to be prepared and obtained as required by the Act. Mr Lado's detention in the forensic psychiatric institution, James Nash House, was noted.
In summary, the court found Mr Lado not guilty of attempted murder by reason of mental incompetence, and ordered his detention and supervision. The court will hear submissions from the parties on an appropriate limiting term before determining any future release conditions.
The court was required to address two primary legal issues. First, whether Mr Lado was mentally competent to commit the offence of attempted murder at the time of the attack, and second, if the objective element of the attempted murder offence had been established. The defence of mental incompetence was raised, which required the court to examine the defendant's mental state at the relevant time.
The court found that Mr Lado was mentally incompetent to commit the offence of attempted murder at the time of the attack, thereby absolving him of criminal liability for the offence. The court declared Mr Lado liable to supervision under Part 8A of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA) for a limiting term to be determined. An order committing Mr Lado to detention was made, with the direction for reports to be prepared and obtained as required by the Act. Mr Lado's detention in the forensic psychiatric institution, James Nash House, was noted.
In summary, the court found Mr Lado not guilty of attempted murder by reason of mental incompetence, and ordered his detention and supervision. The court will hear submissions from the parties on an appropriate limiting term before determining any future release conditions.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
Mental Incompetence
-
Attempted Murder
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Lado [2020] SASC 223
Most Recent Citation
R v Richards [2025] SADC 72
Cases Citing This Decision
18
Peacock v The King
[2024] SASCA 97
Murphy (a pseudonym) v The King
[2023] SASCA 107
Murphy (a pseudonym) v The King
[2023] SASCA 107
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
1
R v Falconer
[1990] HCA 49
R v Falconer
[1990] HCA 49
R v Porter
[1933] HCA 1