R v Kheder

Case [2024] NSWDC 571


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Kheder [2024] NSWDC 571
Hearing dates: 28 November 2024
Date of orders: 29 November 2024
Decision date: 29 November 2024
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Newlinds SC DCJ
Decision:

(1)   The Offender is convicted.

(2)   Taking into account the matter on the s 16BA schedule, and after applying a discount of 10% for the guilty plea, I impose a sentence of imprisonment of 3 years to commence on 28 November 2024 and expire 27 November 2027.

(3) Being satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances, I order, pursuant to s 20(1)(b) of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), the Offender be released forthwith on a Recognizance Release Order for a period of 3 years, commencing 29 November 2024, upon giving security himself in the sum of $5,000 upon conditions found at para [64]

Catchwords:

CRIME — Child sex offences — Child abuse material — Production/Dissemination/Possession — Using carriage service for child abuse material

SENTENCING — Federal offenders — Relevant considerations – Whether “exceptional circumstances” exist under s 20(b) of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act1914 (Cth) s 16A; s 16BA; s 19AB; s 19AC; s 20

Criminal Code (Cth) s 474.22(1)

Cases Cited:

DPP v Latham [2009] TASSC 101

Elias v R (2013) 248 CLR 483

Hili v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520

R v Bredal [2024] NSWCCA 75

R v Clarkson (2011) 32 VR 361

R v Hutchinson [2018] NSWCCA 152

R v Kelly (Edward) [1999] 2 All ER 13

R V Skinner [2016] SACFC 106

RE Crowder v The King [2024] VSCA 211

The Queen v Pham (2015) 256 CLR 550

Category:Sentence
Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (Crown)
Yassar Kheder (Offender)
Representation:

Counsel:
K Ng (Crown)
J Lawrence (Offender)

Solicitors:
CDPP (Crown)
Dehsabzi Lawyers (Offender)
File Number(s): 2022/338733
Publication restriction: Nil

JUDGMENT

Overview

  1. Yassar Kheder (“the Offender”) is to be sentenced for the following offence, to which he pleaded guilty at the Downing Centre District Court on 26 September 2024:

Count

Offence

Description

Max. Penalty

1

s 474.22(1) Criminal Code (Cth)

Between about 11 July 2021 and 28 October 2022 at Wiley Park in New South Wales, did access material using a carriage service, that material being child abuse material.

15 years’ imprisonment and/or $199,800 pecuniary penalty

  1. Pursuant to s 16BA of the CrimesAct1914 (Cth) (Crimes Act) the following further offence is to be taken into account:

Count

Offence

Description

Max. Penalty

On a s 16BA schedule

s 474.22(1) Criminal Code (Cth)

Between about 11 July 2021 and 28 October 2022 at Wiley Park in New South Wales, did possess or control child abuse material obtained or access using a carriage service.

15 years’ imprisonment and/or $199,800 pecuniary penalty

  1. The Offender was arrested and granted bail on 11 November 2022. Any sentence of full-time custody will be backdated by one day.

General sentencing principles

  1. The Court must impose a sentence of a severity appropriate in all the circumstances of the offence: s 16A(1) of the

Continue reading R v Kheder

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Kheder [2024] NSWDC 571
Case
[2024] NSWDC 571
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of R v Kheder involved the defendant, who was convicted on charges related to child sex offences, specifically the production, dissemination, and possession of child abuse material, as well as the use of a carriage service for such material. The case was heard in a federal court where the primary issues were the appropriate sentencing for these offences, considering the statutory guidelines and exceptional circumstances that might warrant a departure from the standard sentencing principles.

The legal issues the court had to address included the determination of the appropriate sentence for the defendant, taking into account the severity of the crimes committed, the potential impact on the community, and any mitigating factors. The court also had to decide whether there were exceptional circumstances that would justify a departure from the usual sentencing approach, particularly under section 20(b) of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), which allows for such a departure if deemed appropriate.

The court meticulously reviewed the evidence and arguments presented, ultimately concluding that while the offences were serious, the defendant’s early guilty plea and other personal circumstances warranted a discount in the sentence. The court imposed a sentence of imprisonment for three years, with a commencement date of 28 November 2024 and an expiration date of 27 November 2027. However, considering the exceptional circumstances, the court also ordered that the defendant be released forthwith on a Recognizance Release Order for the same period, requiring the defendant to provide a security sum of $5,000, subject to specific conditions.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) The Offender is convicted.

(2) Taking into account the matter on the s 16BA schedule, and after applying a discount of 10% for the guilty plea, I impose a sentence of imprisonment of 3 years to commence on 28 November 2024 and expire 27 November 2027.

(3) Being satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances, I order, pursuant to s 20(1)(b) of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), the Offender be released forthwith on a Recognizance Release Order for a period of 3 years, commencing 29 November 2024, upon giving security himself in the sum of $5,000 upon conditions found at para [64]

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.