R v Kelu; R v Millner (No 2)

Case

[2023] NSWSC 1538

13 June 2023

No judgment structure available for this case.

Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Kelu; R v Millner (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 1538
Hearing dates: 13 June 2023
Date of orders: 13 June 2023
Decision date: 13 June 2023
Jurisdiction:Common Law
Before: Cavanagh J
Decision:

The individual juror will be discharged.

Catchwords:

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Trial — Jury — Application to discharge individual juror – where juror sent note indicating that she no longer respected the court officers – whether juror’s ability to perform his or her functions affected – juror discharged

Category:Procedural rulings
Parties: Rex
Jonatan Kelu
Cedric Adrian Millner
Representation:

Counsel:
G Craddock SC with B Stevens (Crown)
M Avenell SC (Mr Kelu)
S Hall SC (Mr Millner)

Solicitors:
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions
Bannisters Lawyers (Mr Kelu)
KPW Lawyers (Mr Millner)
File Number(s): 2018/32462 and 2018/67357
Publication restriction: None

REVISED EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT

  1. I propose to discharge the juror, as it appears to me that the matters raised in Jury Note 6 are likely affecting the juror’s ability to perform his or her functions.

  2. This trial requires the jury’s full attention and concentration on the evidence at all stages (as all trials do) but this trial in particular involves complicated issues requiring the jury members to focus on the documents that have been shown to them. It is particularly important that all members of the jury devote their full attention to what is being said in the courtroom.

  3. The content of the jury note is such that the particular juror is indicating that something has happened in the jury room which is unacceptable to them and that he or she is unable to “respect” the court officers any longer.

  4. The court officers perform a vital role in ensuring that this trial runs smoothly and that jurors do as they are required, in the sense of performing their administrative tasks, coming and going from the courtroom, and so on.

  5. It seems to me that, for the reasons set out, there is a real risk that this juror will not be able to give proper attention to the evidence as it is emerging.

  6. In those circumstances, I propose to discharge the juror.

**********

Decision last updated: 15 December 2023

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0