SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
Case Title: | The Queen v Kekalainen (No 2) |
Citation: | [2015] ACTSC 369 |
Hearing Date: | 5 November 2015 |
DecisionDate: | 11 November 2015 |
Before: | Refshauge J |
Decision: | 1) The conviction of Mark Kekalainen for the offence of culpable driving on 16 March 2013, causing the death of Lorna Anne Cumming be confirmed. 2) Mark Kekalainen be re-sentenced under s 82A of the Crimes (Sentence Administration) Act 2005 as follows: (i) Mark Kekalainen be sentenced to three years and four months imprisonment to commence on 1 October 2014, to take into account pre-sentence custody. (ii) The sentence be suspended today for 27 months and one week. (iii) Mark Kekalainen be required to sign an undertaking to comply with the offender’s good behaviour obligations under the Crimes (Sentence Administration) Act 2005 for a period of 28 months with the following conditions: (a) a probation condition that he be under the supervision of the director general or her delegate and obey all reasonable directions of the person supervising him for two years or such lesser period as the person supervising him considers appropriate. (b) a community service work condition that within two years from today he undertake 250 hours of community service work. (c) he is disqualified from holding or obtaining a licence for two years from today. (d) he attend at ACT Corrective Services, Eclipse House, London Circuit, Canberra City by 4.00 pm tomorrow, 12 November 2015. |
Catchwords: | CRIMINAL LAW – Jurisdiction, practice and procedure – judgment and punishment – re-sentence – culpable driving – remittance from Sentencing Administration Board – periodic detention – directed not to perform periodic detention – alcohol abuse – periodic detention cancelled – mental health concerns – undergoing counselling – suspended sentence – Good Behaviour Order – community service work |
Legislation Cited: | Crimes (Sentence Administration) Act 2005 (ACT), ss 58, 70, 75, 75(5), 82A Crimes (Sentencing) Act 2005 (ACT), s 29(1)(a) |
Cases Cited: | R v Clune (No 2) [1975] VR 737 R v Kekalainen [2014] ACTSC 132 |
Parties: | The Queen (Crown) Mark Kalevi Kekalainen (Defendant) |
Representation: | Counsel Ms A Jamieson-Williams (Crown) Mr J Lawton (Defendant) |
| Solicitors ACT Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Rachel Bird & Co (Defendant) | |
File Number(s): | SCC 219 of 2013 |
REFSHAUGE J:
On 15 March 2013, Mark Kekalainen was driving a motorcycle with a pillion passenger when he lost control of the motorcycle and crashed, killing the pillion passenger.
He was charged with culpable driving whilst he was under the influence of alcohol so as not to have a proper control of the motor vehicle and which caused the death of Lorna Anne Cumming, the pillion passenger.
He pleaded guilty to that charge and, on 29 April 2014, I sentenced him to imprisonment for three years and four months to be served, as to the first nine months, in full time custody and the next 12 months by periodic detention and the sentence was…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read R v Kekalainen (No 2) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2015] ACTSC 369
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the original sentence was manifestly inadequate or excessive. The court also had to consider whether the sentence could be altered under section 82A of the Crimes (Sentence Administration) Act 2005. The appellant's counsel argued that the periodic detention component of the sentence was inappropriate given his alcohol abuse issues and mental health concerns. The respondent contended that the original sentence was appropriate and that no changes were necessary.
The court held that the original sentence was manifestly inadequate given the seriousness of the offence. The court found that periodic detention was not suitable for the appellant due to his alcohol abuse and mental health issues. The court re-sentenced the appellant to three years and four months imprisonment, to be suspended for 27 months and one week. The court also imposed additional conditions including a probation order, community service, disqualification from holding a licence, and a requirement to attend at ACT Corrective Services.
The final orders included the confirmation of the conviction for culpable driving, the re-sentencing with specific conditions, and the imposition of a Good Behaviour Order. The appellant was also required to comply with certain conditions as part of his sentence.
Orders
Orders of the court
1) The conviction of Mark Kekalainen for the offence of culpable driving on 16 March 2013, causing the death of Lorna Anne Cumming be confirmed.
2) Mark Kekalainen be re-sentenced under s 82A of the Crimes (Sentence Administration) Act 2005 as follows:
(i) Mark Kekalainen be sentenced to three years and four months imprisonment to commence on 1 October 2014, to take into account pre-sentence custody.
(ii) The sentence be suspended today for 27 months and one week.
(iii) Mark Kekalainen be required to sign an undertaking to comply with the offender’s good behaviour obligations under the Crimes (Sentence Administration) Act 2005 for a period of 28 months with the following conditions:
(a) a probation condition that he be under the supervision of the director general or her delegate and obey all reasonable directions of the person supervising him for two years or such lesser period as the person supervising him considers appropriate.
(b) a community service work condition that within two years from today he undertake 250 hours of community service work.
(c) he is disqualified from holding or obtaining a licence for two years from today.
(d) he attend at ACT Corrective Services, Eclipse House, London Circuit, Canberra City by 4.00 pm tomorrow, 12 November 2015.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.