R v KD
Case
•
[2019] ACTSC 62
•15 March 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v KD [2019] ACTSC 62
[2019] ACTSC 62
15 March 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appellant, KD, was charged with attempted sexual intercourse without consent in circumstances of family violence. The appellant entered a guilty plea in the County Court of Victoria. The appellant applied for the sentence to be set aside and the matter to be remitted to the County Court for resentencing. The appellant's application was dismissed by the Court of Appeal. The appellant appealed to the High Court of Australia, seeking to overturn the decision of the Court of Appeal. The central legal issue was whether the sentence imposed by the County Court was manifestly excessive. The Court considered the principles governing sentencing in cases of family violence, the appellant's criminal history, and the nature of the offence. The Court concluded that the sentence was not manifestly excessive and dismissed the appeal. The High Court found that the County Court had correctly exercised its discretion in imposing the sentence, taking into account all relevant factors. The original sentence was therefore upheld.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Criminal Liability
-
Sentencing
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v KD [2019] ACTSC 62
Most Recent Citation
Director of Public Prosecutions v Sarmiento [2023] ACTSC 92
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Director of Public Prosecutions v Sarmiento
[2023] ACTSC 92
R v EP (No 3)
[2019] ACTSC 242
R v NX (No 2)
[2019] ACTSC 131
Cases Cited
37
Statutory Material Cited
3
R v Holliday
[2017] HCA 35
Bugmy v The Queen
[2013] HCA 37
Cranfield v The Queen
[2018] ACTCA 3