R v KD

Case

[2019] ACTSC 62

15 March 2019


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
R v KD [2019] ACTSC 62 [2019] ACTSC 62 15 March 2019

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appellant, KD, was charged with attempted sexual intercourse without consent in circumstances of family violence. The appellant entered a guilty plea in the County Court of Victoria. The appellant applied for the sentence to be set aside and the matter to be remitted to the County Court for resentencing. The appellant's application was dismissed by the Court of Appeal. The appellant appealed to the High Court of Australia, seeking to overturn the decision of the Court of Appeal. The central legal issue was whether the sentence imposed by the County Court was manifestly excessive. The Court considered the principles governing sentencing in cases of family violence, the appellant's criminal history, and the nature of the offence. The Court concluded that the sentence was not manifestly excessive and dismissed the appeal. The High Court found that the County Court had correctly exercised its discretion in imposing the sentence, taking into account all relevant factors. The original sentence was therefore upheld.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

Legal Concepts

  • Jurisdiction

  • Criminal Liability

  • Sentencing

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

6

R v EP (No 3) [2019] ACTSC 242
R v NX (No 2) [2019] ACTSC 131
Cases Cited

37

Statutory Material Cited

3

R v Holliday [2017] HCA 35
Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37
Cranfield v The Queen [2018] ACTCA 3